A Louisiana woman sued Heineken USA for misleading consumers with its alcohol-free label of Heineken 0.0 which contains 0.03 percent alcohol.
The Louisiana Record showed that Heineken USA allegedly violated the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act, state consumer fraud acts, breaches of express warranty, implied warranty of merchantability, Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, as well as committed fraud, and unjust enrichment.
The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Louisiana pointed out that in Heineken 0.0's own FAQ page, the brand admits it contains “an extremely small amount of alcohol, maximum 0.03 percent ABV."
The plaintiff Kathleen M. Wilson argues that some who bought the beer don't want even this "minuscule amount of alcohol" and shouldn't be called "0.0" at all.
Wilson added that consumers should be fully informed of the ingredients in the product even if it contains less than .03 alcohol to give them the option to choose.
The plaintiff says she wanted a product with no alcohol and was misled by Heineken's "false and deceptive representation," which caused her to purchase their N/A beer; therefore, she has suffered damages.
Wilson asked for injunctive relief demanding that Heineken change its labeling of the product, monetary damages, and court costs.
On its website, the brand noted that 0.03 percent of ABV has the same or even lower alcohol level than other food products, such as bread, bakery products, juices, and bananas. This was due to the natural fermentation of ingredients, such as cereals and fruits.
Heineken pointed out that fermentation is a natural process, and minuscule alcohol levels can be found everywhere.
The website also insists that its Heineken 0.0 label and ingredient declaration do not violate local food laws and regulations.


Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision
The Beauty Beneath the Expressway: A Journey from Self to Service
Ghislaine Maxwell to Invoke Fifth Amendment at House Oversight Committee Deposition
Asian Stocks Slip as Tech Rout Deepens, Japan Steadies Ahead of Election
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Trump Administration Appeals Court Order to Release Hudson Tunnel Project Funding
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
Yes, government influences wages – but not just in the way you might think
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project 



