SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Singapore Budget 2026 Set for Fiscal Prudence as Growth Remains Resilient 
Yes, government influences wages – but not just in the way you might think 
U.S. Stock Futures Slide as Tech Rout Deepens on Amazon Capex Shock 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Why have so few atrocities ever been recognised as genocide? 
Oil Prices Slide on US-Iran Talks, Dollar Strength and Profit-Taking Pressure 
The ghost of Robodebt – Federal Court rules billions of dollars in welfare debts must be recalculated 
The Beauty Beneath the Expressway: A Journey from Self to Service 
Parents abused by their children often suffer in silence – specialist therapy is helping them find a voice 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Youth are charting new freshwater futures by learning from the water on the water 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize 
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
