Barclays Downgrades Renault as Cost Savings Challenges Grow 
Baidu Shares Sink to One-Year Low as Ad Weakness Overshadows AI Growth 
Welspun Corp Shares Hit Record High on $1.8 Billion U.S. Order 
SEC Sues Former Tricolor Executives Over $1.9 Billion Investor Fraud Scheme 
OpenAI Tightens AI Safety Monitoring After Security Incidents 
Samsung Eyes $72 Billion Shareholder Return Plan as AI Chip Boom Fuels Profits 
OpenAI Revenue Rises 18% in Q2 as Losses Widen and Anthropic Surges Ahead 
Toyota, Honda Shares Rise on Possible U.S.-Canada Auto Tariff Cut 
CK Hutchison Seeks $1.5 Billion From Panama Over Canal Ports 
Moody’s Affirms NVIDIA Aa1 Rating as AI Data Center Guarantees Reach $105 Billion 
Google to Buy Spirit Airlines Business Data for $10 Million to Train AI 
Schott Pharma Stock Rises as Barclays Upgrades Rating on Growth Outlook 
SK Hynix Shares Surge on Record $28.6 Billion Buyback 
Coty Revenue Beats Estimates as Beauty Demand Holds Firm 
Unitree Robotics Shares Soar Over 600% in Shanghai Market Debut 
Moderna Short Sellers Hit With $4.8 Billion Loss as Stock Soars 
Nordson Stock Rises as Q3 Earnings Beat Estimates, Outlook Raised 
 - EconoTimes)
Add as a preferred source on Google
NEW YORK, Oct. 27, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Opus Bank (“Opus Bank” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:OPB) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of purchasers of Orbital common stock between securities between July 28, 2014, and October 17, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and financial prospects. The Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: (1) that a percentage of the Company’s loans were of inferior quality; (2) that the Company was over-representing the quality of the loans to the public; (3) that, as such, the Company failed to properly account for the loans in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”); (4) that, as a result, the Company would be forced to recognize large write-offs associated with the loans; (5) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls over accounting and financial reporting; and (6) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about Opus’s business, operations, and financial prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
The Company’s stock price has dropped from a November 2015 high of $39.89 to a current price of $20.23.
Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the Firm prior to the December 27, 2016 lead plaintiff motion deadline. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation or discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
