Niigata Set to Approve Restart of Japan’s Largest Nuclear Power Plant in Major Energy Shift 
Google and Apple Warn U.S. Visa Holders to Avoid International Travel Amid Lengthy Embassy Delays 
Uber and Baidu Partner to Test Robotaxis in the UK, Marking a New Milestone for Autonomous Ride-Hailing 
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement 
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Boeing Seeks FAA Emissions Waiver to Continue 777F Freighter Sales Amid Strong Cargo Demand 
Moore Threads Unveils New GPUs, Fuels Optimism Around China’s AI Chip Ambitions 
FedEx Beats Q2 Earnings Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook Despite Stock Dip 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions 
7-Eleven CEO Joe DePinto to Retire After Two Decades at the Helm 
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
FDA Fast-Tracks Approval of Altria’s on! PLUS Nicotine Pouches Under New Pilot Program 
Seatrium Reaches $475 Million Settlement With Maersk Over Offshore Wind Vessel Project 
Citi Appoints Ryan Ellis as Head of Markets Sales for Australia and New Zealand 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 18, 2017 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Ophthotech Corporation (“Ophthotech” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:OPHT) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Ophthotech between May 11, 2015 and December 12, 2016 (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
According to the Complaint, Defendants made overtly positive representations regarding the effectiveness of its treatment Fovista and Fovista’s potential when used in combination with Lucentis, a commercially available anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent. According to the Complaint, Ophthotech made these statements despite its awareness that the phase 3 clinical trial of Fovista would not meet its primary endpoint of change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline at 12 months over Lucentis alone. The Complaint further alleges that these statements caused Ophthotech stock to trade at artificially inflated prices.
On December 12, 2016, Ophthotech released its discouraging results for two phase 3 clinical trials that were testing its experimental compound Fovista combined with the Lucentis drug. Following this news, Ophthotech stock dropped close to 86% during to close at $5.29 per share.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 13, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
