TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Elon Musk has secured a major legal victory after the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision and reinstated his controversial 2018 compensation package as chief executive officer of Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA). The ruling, issued on Friday, restores a stock-based pay plan now valued at nearly $140 billion, reaffirming Musk’s entitlement to what was once the largest executive compensation package in U.S. corporate history.
The 2018 Tesla pay package was originally approved by shareholders and designed to reward Musk only if Tesla achieved a series of ambitious market value and operational milestones. At the time of authorization, the plan was unprecedented in size and structure. Although it has since been eclipsed by a separate compensation plan approved by Tesla shareholders in 2024—potentially worth up to $1 trillion if future performance targets are met—the 2018 package remains a landmark case in executive pay governance.
The compensation plan had been frozen following a lawsuit brought by a Tesla investor who owned just nine shares. The case was heard in Delaware, where Tesla was incorporated at the time. Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick ruled that the Tesla board failed to prove the compensation plan was fair to shareholders, despite it being approved twice by investors. She concluded that the scale of the payout was excessive and placed an unfair burden on shareholders.
However, the Delaware Supreme Court disagreed with that assessment. In its ruling, the court stated that the lower court erred in canceling the pay package and described the decision as “inequitable.” The justices emphasized that nullifying the plan effectively left Musk uncompensated for six years of work and leadership that significantly increased Tesla’s value.
The decision marks a critical moment for Tesla corporate governance, executive compensation debates, and shareholder rights, while reinforcing Musk’s central role in Tesla’s long-term growth and strategic vision.
