Since departing from the White House in January, former President Donald Trump has been living at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida full-time. However, as many locals have brought up the agreement he made in 1993, the Palm Beach Council will not conduct a review as to whether Trump will now be allowed to reside there.
The town council of Palm Beach is undergoing a deliberation to decide whether Trump can stay at his Mar-a-Lago resort full time. This is despite Trump facing an impeachment trial before the Senate this week. The council will hear from the attorney’s opinion on whether it can stop Trump from residing in his club due to the 1993 agreement Trump made with the town. The agreement was that Trump cannot reside in the town should he convert Mar-a-Lago from a residence to a resort.
The agreement was brought up when a neighbor in the area through an attorney sent a letter to the council demanding that the former president stop living at the resort. The neighbor cited that the former president actively residing at Mar-a-Lago would lower property values in the area.
It should be noted that Trump is technically an employee of the corporation that owns Mar-a-Lago and the written agreement only states that members are not allowed to live there. Via the town’s regulations, the club can provide onsite housing to employees. Trump returns to being an employee after leaving office last January 20. Trump and former first lady Melania Trump have since changed their voting address to Mar-a-Lago back in 2019 and have been voting in the state.
Aside from the possibility that Trump may not be allowed to reside in Mar-a-Lago full time, Trump was recently issued a permanent ban from SAG-AFTRA. The organization’s National Board announced that they passed a resolution permanently barring Trump from re-applying for membership in the union. This was in light of Trump’s involvement during the January 6 riots at the Capitol that led to the union to discuss disciplinary action. This also led to Trump issuing a resignation letter upon receiving a threat of getting kicked out.
“Preventing Donald Trump from ever rejoining SAG-AFTRA is more than a symbolic step. It is a resounding statement that threatening or inciting harm against fellow members will not be tolerated. An attack against one is an attack against all,” said SAG-AFTRA president Gabrielle Carteris in a statement.


Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Trump Stays Neutral on 2028 GOP Successor as Vance and Rubio Emerge as Top Contenders
Illinois Joins WHO Global Outbreak Network After U.S. Exit, Following California’s Lead
Trump Endorses Clay Fuller in Georgia Special Election to Replace Marjorie Taylor Greene
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Could Expand as Ukraine Peace Talks Continue, Says Treasury Secretary Bessent
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks in Abu Dhabi Show Cautious Progress Amid Ongoing Fighting
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Keir Starmer Faces Political Crisis After Condemning Peter Mandelson Over Epstein Ties
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Trump Intelligence Office Probes Puerto Rico Voting Machines Amid Election Security Concerns
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
UN Warns of Growing Nuclear Risks as New START Treaty Expires 



