Trump Administration Fuel-Efficiency Rollback Could Raise Long-Term Costs for U.S. Drivers 
European Leaders Tie Ukraine Territorial Decisions to Strong Security Guarantees 
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip 
Belarus Frees 123 Political Prisoners in U.S.-Brokered Deal Over Sanctions 
Sydney Bondi Beach Terror Attack Kills 16, Sparks Gun Law and Security Debate 
Jimmy Lai Convicted Under Hong Kong National Security Law in Landmark Case 
Korea Zinc to Build $7.4 Billion Critical Minerals Refinery in Tennessee With U.S. Government Backing 
Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices 
Thousands Protest in Brazil Against Efforts to Reduce Jair Bolsonaro’s Prison Sentence 
Belarus Frees Opposition Leaders Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka in U.S.-Brokered Deal 
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant 
Ireland Limits Planned Trade Ban on Israeli Settlements to Goods Only 
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute 
U.S. Homeland Security Ends TSA Union Contract, Prompting Legal Challenge 
U.S. and Mexico Reach New Agreement to Tackle Tijuana River Sewage Crisis 
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
A U.S. appeals court has blocked President Donald Trump's administration from proceeding with mass layoffs of federal workers and a sweeping government reorganization. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that barred the plan, marking a major setback for the Trump-Musk-backed overhaul efforts.
The case centers on an executive order aimed at restructuring about 20 federal agencies by slashing tens of thousands of jobs, eliminating regional offices, and automating government functions. The order, spearheaded by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and strongly supported by Elon Musk, was deemed by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston to exceed presidential powers without congressional approval.
In a 2-1 decision, the appeals court agreed, stating the administration failed to show it would face irreparable harm if the lower court’s block remained. Judges William Fletcher and Lucy Koh, both appointed by Democratic presidents, argued that only Congress holds the authority to create and fund federal agencies. Republican-appointed Judge Consuelo Callahan dissented, saying the administration was likely to win on appeal.
Illston's ruling cited severe consequences of the layoffs, including near-total staff cuts at a Department of Labor office in Pittsburgh and deep reductions at agencies like Head Start and Social Security. The ruling also halted further action by DOGE, which had been working with agencies to implement job cuts since February.
The White House criticized the ruling as an overreach by the judiciary, while unions and advocacy groups praised it as a victory for constitutional checks and balances. The administration is expected to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This decision halts one of the most aggressive federal workforce reductions in U.S. history, reflecting growing legal resistance to executive-driven agency restructuring.
