Argentina Senate Blocks Milei’s Supreme Court Picks Amid Political Tensions

Argentina’s Senate has rejected President Javier Milei’s controversial Supreme Court nominations, dealing a political blow to the libertarian leader. The Senate voted against the appointments of federal judge Ariel Lijo and legal scholar Manuel Garcia-Mansilla, both of whom were named in a February decree by Milei.

Lijo's nomination was rejected by 43 votes to 27, with one abstention, while Garcia-Mansilla was turned down by a wider margin of 51 to 20. Some conservative lawmakers joined opposition parties in the vote, reflecting widespread resistance across Argentina’s political spectrum.

The president's move to appoint justices by decree sparked backlash from jurists, human rights organizations, and legal experts, who raised concerns over the procedural legitimacy and qualifications of the nominees. Critics argued that Milei bypassed constitutional norms and failed to build consensus, further deepening political divisions.

Opposition Senator Jose Mayans emphasized the importance of legislative oversight, stating, “You cannot appoint judges by decree. We will not accept that in any way.”

The Senate holds the constitutional authority to approve or reject judicial appointments, and this vote underscores the institutional checks on Milei’s power. The rejection not only halts Milei’s attempt to reshape the judiciary but also signals increasing challenges to his broader reform agenda.

The failed nominations highlight growing political resistance to Milei’s leadership style and his efforts to centralize control. As Argentina grapples with economic and social tensions, the president’s inability to push through key judicial appointments may complicate future legislative battles.

This development marks a significant setback for Milei, whose anti-establishment rhetoric and bold policy moves continue to stir controversy in Argentina’s deeply divided political landscape.