Jill Wine-Banks, a former Watergate prosecutor, has ignited a firestorm with her controversial suggestion that President Joe Biden issue preemptive pardons to himself and key figures, including Special Counsel Jack Smith. Her proposal, aired during a public discussion, comes amid growing concerns over potential retaliatory actions from the incoming Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ).
Wine-Banks argued that proactive pardons could shield Biden and his allies from politically motivated prosecutions under President-elect Donald Trump. Her comments have divided opinion, with critics accusing her of undermining the rule of law while supporters claim such measures are necessary to protect democratic institutions.
Pardoning Himself: Legal and Ethical Quagmire
Wine-Banks’ suggestion that Biden preemptively pardon himself has stirred significant debate over the constitutional implications. Historically, no U.S. president has pardoned themselves, and legal scholars remain divided on whether such an action is even permissible. Critics argue that a self-pardon would set a dangerous precedent, potentially eroding public trust in the justice system.
Proponents, however, view the move as a defensive strategy against anticipated investigations and charges from a Trump-led DOJ. They cite Trump’s previous threats to prosecute political opponents as evidence of the risks Biden faces.
Extending Pardons to Allies
Wine-Banks also proposed pardoning Jack Smith, who led investigations into Trump’s actions during his presidency. This aspect of her suggestion has drawn accusations of partisanship, with opponents claiming it would politicize the pardon power. Yet supporters counter that it could prevent the weaponization of federal agencies against public servants simply doing their jobs.
Online Reactions Highlight Deep Divisions
The proposal has sparked a heated debate online, with netizens weighing in from across the political spectrum:
- @JusticeForAll: “If Trump can pardon his cronies, why can’t Biden protect those who uphold democracy? It’s only fair.”
- @LibertyFirst: “Biden pardoning himself? This is the kind of thing that makes people lose faith in government.”
- @BlueWave2024: “Jill Wine-Banks is absolutely right. We need to protect our leaders from Trump’s vendetta machine.”
- @PatriotGuard99: “This idea is insane. No one should be above the law, not Trump and definitely not Biden.”
- @DemocracyDefender: “If Biden pardons himself, he loses the moral high ground forever. Terrible idea.”
- @FreedomNow88: “Preemptive pardons? Sounds like something out of a dictatorship. America deserves better leadership than this.”


Zelenskiy Signals Willingness to Drop NATO Bid as Ukraine, U.S. Hold Crucial Peace Talks in Berlin
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
U.S. Special Forces Intercept Ship Carrying Military Components Bound for Iran
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs
Ukraine’s NATO Concession Unlikely to Shift Peace Talks, Experts Say
Belarus Frees Opposition Leaders Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka in U.S.-Brokered Deal
Belarus Frees 123 Political Prisoners in U.S.-Brokered Deal Over Sanctions
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline
Trump Signals Two Final Candidates for Fed Chair, Calls for Presidential Input on Interest Rates
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
Israeli Airstrike in Gaza Targets Senior Hamas Commander Amid Ceasefire Tensions
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders 



