South Korea Exports Surge in January on AI Chip Demand, Marking Fastest Growth in 4.5 Years 
Why Trump’s new pick for Fed chair hit gold and silver markets – for good reasons 
Asian Stocks Waver as Trump Signals Fed Pick, Shutdown Deal and Tech Earnings Stir Markets 
Elon Musk’s SpaceX Explores Merger Options With Tesla or xAI, Reports Say 
Apple Forecasts Strong Revenue Growth as iPhone Demand Surges in China and India 
Asian Currencies Trade Flat as Dollar Retreats After Fed Decision 
Using the Economic Calendar to Reduce Surprise Driven Losses in Forex 
Climate Adaptation at Home: How Irrigreen Makes Conservation Effortless 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Apple Earnings Beat Expectations as iPhone Sales Surge to Four-Year High 
Gold and Silver Prices Plunge as Trump Taps Kevin Warsh for Fed Chair 
Oil Prices Surge Toward Biggest Monthly Gains in Years Amid Middle East Tensions 
U.S. Eases Venezuela Oil Sanctions to Boost American Investment After Maduro Ouster 
Elon Musk’s Empire: SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI Merger Talks Spark Investor Debate 
Indonesia Stocks Face Fragile Sentiment After MSCI Warning and Market Rout 
Russia Stocks End Flat as MOEX Closes Unchanged Amid Mixed Global Signals 
Copper Prices Hit Record Highs as Metals Rally Gains Momentum on Geopolitical Tensions 
Uber, the transport company, headquartered in San Francisco, California, is facing a lawsuit after the United States filed a legal case against it. The U.S. Justice Department sued Uber on Wednesday due to alleged overcharging of disabled passengers.
In the lawsuit, the US asked a federal court to order the ride-hailing company to follow the laws that protect people with disabilities from discrimination. As per Reuters, it was the Justice Department that filed the suit in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco this week.
The case looks into the Uber policy that was implemented in April 2016 where it requires extra charges for passengers that the company calls "wait time fees." This was initially followed in some cities until it was expanded and covered all states across the country.
This policy was said to be a discrimination against disabled people and violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. The suit stated that those with disabilities such as the blind and those with wheelchairs naturally need more time to get into the Uber vehicle so the policy is unfair for them.
"People with disabilities deserve equal access to all areas of community life, including the private transportation services provided by companies like Uber," Kristen Clarke, assistant attorney general for the DOJ's civil rights division, said in a statement. "This lawsuit seeks to bring Uber into compliance with the mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act while sending a powerful message that Uber cannot penalize passengers with disabilities simply because they need more time to get into a car."
The Justice Department simply wants the court to instruct Uber to revise its wait time fee policy and to pay damages to people who were subjected to illegal fees. The New York Times further reported that while Uber may know that disabled passengers may require at least a few minutes to get into the vehicle, it did not revise its policy to exclude the disabled for its waiting fee policy and charged them instead.
Finally, in response to the lawsuit, Uber said it has been in talks with the DOJ regarding the said rule. The company said it was only intended for riders who kept drivers waiting and not for those who needed extra time to get into the vehicle. Uber said it had refunded passengers with disabilities who informed the company about the charge.
