The United States Supreme Court justices and federal judges are now made to adhere to stricter public disclosure rules. The rules would require the judges to disclose free trips, meals, or gifts received following calls by lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
A letter from the federal judiciary’s administrative wing confirmed the changes the justices and the judges are now required to adhere to was published on Tuesday by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has long called for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said the disclosure rules for the judiciary are more relaxed than other branches of government.
“These new rules will make it much harder for justices to travel, dine, hunt, or vacation for free at the private resort of a wealthy corporate executive – especially one with business before their court – and avoid disclosing that information to the public,” said Whitehouse in a statement.
The changes took effect on March 14 and were adopted by a panel of the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the judiciary. The details of the changes were revealed in a March 23 letter to Whitehouse by federal judge Roslynn Mauskopf, the director of the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must disclose stays at commercial properties like hotels and resorts and gifts of hospitality paid for by an entity or third-party other than the provider.
However, judges still do not have to disclose gifts that include food, lodging, or entertainment extended by an individual for non-business purposes.
Whitehouse and other Democratic lawmakers have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, strengthen recusal standards for judges, and boost financial disclosure requirements. Last year, Congress passed legislation that further required judges to periodically disclose stock trades.
Meanwhile, a group of senior Democratic lawmakers is set to introduce legislation that would further ensure that weapons sales by the United States to foreign customers do not end up contributing to human rights abuses. The legislation, referred to as the Safeguard Act, would codify the new Conventional Arms Transfer policy that was introduced in February by the Biden administration to increase the emphasis on human rights concerns, according to information seen by Reuters.
Democratic senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, are leading the legislation with nine other congressional Democrats.


US Delivers $13M Autonomous Maritime Drones to Philippines
Trump Requests $11 Billion More in Farm Aid as Rising Costs Pressure U.S. Farmers
ICC Judges Sue Trump Administration Over Sanctions, Calling Measures Unlawful
Marco Rubio Reassures Gulf Allies Over U.S.-Iran Peace Deal
Andy Burnham Emerges as Favorite After Keir Starmer Resigns
Trump Highlights Manufacturing Agenda in Pennsylvania as Midterm Elections Approach
Russia Signals Frustration Over Unfulfilled U.S. Commitments After Alaska Summit
DOJ Opens Investigation Into NYC Coffee Shop Over Anti-Goldman Social Media Post
U.S. Eases Iran Team Travel Restrictions Ahead of Seattle World Cup Match
Russian Air Strikes Injure Six Across Ukraine as Kyiv Issues Air Raid Alert
US Senate Approves War Powers Resolution Urging Trump to End Iran Military Action
Cait Conley Wins Democratic Nomination, Sets Up Key House Battle Against Mike Lawler in New York
California Court Dismisses Trump Administration Lawsuit Against Los Angeles Sanctuary Policy
U.S. Reviewing Potential F-35 Fighter Jet Sale to Turkey Amid S-400 Dispute
Alan Greenspan: 7 Fascinating Facts About the Former Fed Chairman
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
Marco Rubio Seeks Gulf Support for U.S.-Iran Peace Deal Amid Regional Concerns 



