The United States Supreme Court justices and federal judges are now made to adhere to stricter public disclosure rules. The rules would require the judges to disclose free trips, meals, or gifts received following calls by lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
A letter from the federal judiciary’s administrative wing confirmed the changes the justices and the judges are now required to adhere to was published on Tuesday by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has long called for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said the disclosure rules for the judiciary are more relaxed than other branches of government.
“These new rules will make it much harder for justices to travel, dine, hunt, or vacation for free at the private resort of a wealthy corporate executive – especially one with business before their court – and avoid disclosing that information to the public,” said Whitehouse in a statement.
The changes took effect on March 14 and were adopted by a panel of the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the judiciary. The details of the changes were revealed in a March 23 letter to Whitehouse by federal judge Roslynn Mauskopf, the director of the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must disclose stays at commercial properties like hotels and resorts and gifts of hospitality paid for by an entity or third-party other than the provider.
However, judges still do not have to disclose gifts that include food, lodging, or entertainment extended by an individual for non-business purposes.
Whitehouse and other Democratic lawmakers have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, strengthen recusal standards for judges, and boost financial disclosure requirements. Last year, Congress passed legislation that further required judges to periodically disclose stock trades.
Meanwhile, a group of senior Democratic lawmakers is set to introduce legislation that would further ensure that weapons sales by the United States to foreign customers do not end up contributing to human rights abuses. The legislation, referred to as the Safeguard Act, would codify the new Conventional Arms Transfer policy that was introduced in February by the Biden administration to increase the emphasis on human rights concerns, according to information seen by Reuters.
Democratic senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, are leading the legislation with nine other congressional Democrats.


Europe Warns Russia Is Escalating Hybrid Attacks Across NATO
Judge Orders Trump to Restore White House Access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico
South Korea, US Discuss Warship Building Cooperation
North Korea Warns South Korea Over US-Led Defense Role
Netanyahu Takes Aim at Mamdani as Israel Election Nears
EU Defence Build-Up Too Slow for 2030 Russia Readiness Goal
North Korea Rejects Nuclear Test Warning, Calls Nuclear Status Irreversible
Netanyahu Defends Israel at UN as Delegates Stage Walkout
Trump Asks Supreme Court to Restore Third-Country Deportations
Netanyahu’s Brief US Trip Highlights Strains With Trump
NATO Boosts Intelligence Sharing Amid Russia Hybrid Threats
France Defends Netanyahu Airspace Clearance Despite ICC Warrant
Taiwan Thanks US for Support Ahead of Trump-Xi Summit
US Invites Putin to Miami G20, Opening Door to Trump Summit
Russian Missile and Drone Attack on Kyiv Kills Two, Damages Maternity Hospital
Sudan Rejects US Legitimacy Remarks, Defends Sovereignty
Pezeshkian Says US Must Choose When Iran War Ends 



