A former conservative United States appeals court judge has called for a stronger ethics code on the Supreme Court justices. The call follows reports of conservative justice Clarence Thomas’ relations with a major Republican megadonor.
In an interview with Reuters, former judge J. Michael Luttig said Supreme Court justices must be bound to a stronger ethics code compared to lower court judges. Luttig served as a clerk for Chief Justice Warren Burger before serving on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals for 15 years. Luttig is also known to have testified before the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection.
Luttig said the justices must “be bound by higher standards of conduct” compared to lower-ranked federal judges.
“It’s the titular head of the judicial branch of government and I believe that the expectations for the Supreme Court Justices are rightly tighter than for any other public official in the land,” said Luttig. The former judge did not comment, however, when pressed by Reuters on the report by ProPublica that revealed the relationship between Thomas and Crow that included real estate purchases and luxury trips paid for by the GOP megadonor.
The reports have since raised questions over potential conflicts of interest in the courts, especially as Supreme Court Justices are not bound to a code of conduct. Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin scheduled a hearing on the matter next week, inviting Chief Justice John Roberts to testify before the committee. Roberts declined to testify in a letter to Durbin on Thursday.
Durbin responded to Roberts’ letter in a statement, saying that ethics reform for the Supreme Court must happen whether or not the justices participate in the process. Durbin also stressed the need for Congress to establish a code of ethics for the highest court in the country.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department has challenged a new law in Tennessee that banned doctors from providing gender-affirming medical care for transgender youths, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgery. The DOJ said the law violated the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which promised equal protection.
The DOJ also said it was requesting the court to issue an immediate order preventing the law from taking effect on July 1.


Israeli Airstrike in Gaza Targets Senior Hamas Commander Amid Ceasefire Tensions
Ukraine’s NATO Concession Unlikely to Shift Peace Talks, Experts Say
Belarus Frees Opposition Leaders Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka in U.S.-Brokered Deal
Belarus Frees 123 Political Prisoners in U.S.-Brokered Deal Over Sanctions
Zelenskiy Signals Willingness to Drop NATO Bid as Ukraine, U.S. Hold Crucial Peace Talks in Berlin
Global Leaders Condemn Deadly Antisemitic Shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach During Hanukkah
Hong Kong Democratic Party Disbands After Member Vote Amid Security Crackdown
Thousands Protest in Brazil Against Efforts to Reduce Jair Bolsonaro’s Prison Sentence
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
U.S. Soldiers Killed in ISIS Attack in Palmyra, Syria During Counterterrorism Mission
Syria Arrests Five Suspects After Deadly Attack on U.S. and Syrian Troops in Palmyra
U.S. Intelligence Briefly Curtailed Information Sharing With Israel Amid Gaza War Concerns
Thailand Vows Continued Military Action Amid Cambodia Border Clash Despite Trump Ceasefire Claim
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
U.S. Special Forces Intercept Ship Carrying Military Components Bound for Iran
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 



