Menu

Search

  |   Politics

Menu

  |   Politics

Search

U.S. Discusses Migrant Transfer Plan With Palau Despite Lawmaker Opposition

U.S. Discusses Migrant Transfer Plan With Palau Despite Lawmaker Opposition. Source: Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The United States has renewed discussions with Palau over a controversial proposal to transfer third-country nationals to the Pacific Island nation, despite clear resistance from Palau’s lawmakers earlier this year. According to a statement from the U.S. State Department, Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau spoke on Tuesday with Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr. about a potential new Memorandum of Understanding related to the transfer of migrants who have no known criminal histories.

The talks come amid President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement strategy, which has included a large-scale deportation drive and the use of third countries to receive migrants who are not citizens of those nations. Human rights organizations have strongly criticized these policies, raising concerns about due process, lack of legal safeguards, and the risk of migrants being sent to countries where they have no social, cultural, or legal ties.

Under the proposed U.S.-Palau arrangement, migrants from third countries could be relocated to Palau, a nation of approximately 17,000 people located in the western Pacific Ocean. In late July, however, Palau’s Congress publicly rejected a similar request from Washington, stating that it “cannot accept” a proposal to receive asylum seekers from other nations. That rejection highlighted domestic political concerns within Palau about capacity, legal responsibility, and humanitarian obligations.

Palau maintains a Compact of Free Association with the United States, under which it receives economic assistance in exchange for granting the U.S. military access to its territory. Despite this close relationship, Palau is not a signatory to the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention, raising additional questions about how transferred migrants would be protected under international law.

The Trump administration has defended its immigration measures as necessary for strengthening domestic security. However, criticism has intensified both domestically and internationally. U.S. Catholic bishops have condemned immigration enforcement practices, and in October, Pope Leo XIV spoke out against the mistreatment of immigrants. Legal challenges are also ongoing, with a federal judge recently signaling a willingness to block the rapid deportation of migrants to third countries without adequate notice or the chance to raise fears of persecution or torture.

As negotiations continue, the proposed U.S.-Palau migrant transfer plan remains a flashpoint in the broader debate over immigration policy, human rights, and international responsibility.

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.