A proposal by the Biden administration this week outlined broad asylum restrictions at the southern border. The proposal could bar tens of thousands of migrants that are looking to enter the United States from claiming asylum in an effort to deter illegal crossings.
The Biden administration on Tuesday unveiled a proposal outlining broad restrictions on asylum claims in an effort to deter illegal crossings to the southern border. Under the new restrictions, migrants that do not schedule an appointment at a US border port of entry or avail of the humanitarian programs for certain nationalities would not be eligible to claim asylum with some exceptions. Migrants must also first seek and be denied protection in countries they pass through in order to claim asylum in the US.
While Biden sought to reverse the immigration policies of his Republican predecessor Donald Trump, his administration has sought to address the record numbers of migrants looking to enter the US. The US leader has also come under criticism from advocates and some of his fellow Democrats for embracing Trump-era restrictions.
The new restrictions are also similar to that of the Trump administration, which was blocked by federal courts and has also received similar opposition. The American Civil Liberties Union pledged to fight the new policies in court if implemented. Activists have referred to the restrictions as a “transit ban.”
The rule, however, would exempt unaccompanied minors while it would apply to families and single adults. The measure would be temporary and be limited to a two-year period with the possibility of extension. A Biden administration official told reporters that the rule would aim to “fill the void that Congress has left by taking no action” to revamp immigration laws or increase funding for border security.
Meanwhile, Seattle has become the first city in the US to explicitly ban discrimination based on caste – a social system dating back thousands of years and is practiced in South Asia. This comes as rights groups have expressed support for the measure amid a push for caste discrimination to be recognized under the existing state and federal anti-discrimination laws, including lawsuits against employers who have large workforces in South Asia.
However, some Hindu-American groups have opposed the measure, saying that the measure would target their community and may discourage firms from hiring Hindus in major positions.


CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Trump Rejects Putin’s New START Extension Offer, Raising Fears of a New Nuclear Arms Race
UAE Plans Temporary Housing Complex for Displaced Palestinians in Southern Gaza
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
U.S.–Iran Nuclear Talks Scheduled in Oman as Diplomatic Efforts Resume
Keir Starmer Faces Political Crisis After Condemning Peter Mandelson Over Epstein Ties
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Trump Endorses Clay Fuller in Georgia Special Election to Replace Marjorie Taylor Greene
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump Allegedly Sought Airport, Penn Station Renaming in Exchange for Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Marco Rubio Steps Down as Acting U.S. Archivist Amid Federal Law Limits
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
U.S. Justice Department Removes DHS Lawyer After Blunt Remarks in Minnesota Immigration Court
Illinois Joins WHO Global Outbreak Network After U.S. Exit, Following California’s Lead 



