A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled in favor of allowing President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs to remain in effect, reinforcing one of his key economic policies. On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extended a prior decision that temporarily upheld the tariffs after a lower trade court attempted to block them.
The legal dispute stems from a lawsuit filed by small businesses, which claimed that Trump overstepped his authority by imposing sweeping "liberation day" tariffs on major trading partners under emergency powers. These businesses argued the tariffs lacked justification and would cause significant economic harm.
While the U.S. Court of International Trade initially sided with the plaintiffs, the appeals court determined that national trade concerns and ongoing negotiations outweighed the immediate economic risks to small businesses. As a result, Trump’s tariffs will remain in place while the court further reviews whether the former president exceeded his authority under trade law.
It’s important to note that this ruling pertains only to the so-called "liberation day" tariffs and not to the separate tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that Trump imposed earlier in his term.
Trump announced the aggressive tariff strategy in April, targeting key global economies in an effort to reduce the U.S. trade deficit. However, implementation was delayed by 90 days, giving other countries until July to reach a trade agreement with the U.S.
This legal development highlights the ongoing complexity of U.S. trade policy, with potential ripple effects for global commerce, small businesses, and international negotiations. As the July deadline approaches, global markets continue to monitor the outcome of these court decisions and trade talks.


Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 



