US Expands Iran Sanctions, Targets Major Crypto Exchanges and Individuals 
SEC Tokenized Stock Approval Still Expected as Regulatory Framework Advances 
Pedro Sanchez’s Wife Ordered to Stand Trial in Spain Corruption Case 
US Waives Iran Sanctions for 60 Days as Peace Talks Advance and Lebanon Sees Calm 
Russia Signals Frustration Over Unfulfilled U.S. Commitments After Alaska Summit 
U.S. Launches Trade Investigation Into Germany’s Pharmaceutical Cost-Cutting Plans 
DOJ Opens Investigation Into NYC Coffee Shop Over Anti-Goldman Social Media Post 
Andy Burnham Emerges as Favorite After Keir Starmer Resigns 
Lebanon Pushes Ahead With Israel Talks Despite Iran-U.S. Deal Impact 
Trump Highlights Manufacturing Agenda in Pennsylvania as Midterm Elections Approach 
Trump Administration Closes Delta Air Lines Investigation Over 2024 CrowdStrike Outage 
US Sanctions Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel and Key Officials Amid Rising Tensions 
Australia Eases Capital Gains Tax Reforms to Support Small Businesses and Startups 
Alan Greenspan: 7 Fascinating Facts About the Former Fed Chairman 
US Military Strike on Suspected Drug Trafficking Vessel Leaves Two Dead in Caribbean 
Bessent Says U.S. Must Strengthen Supply Chains and Economic Security 
Peru Election Dispute Deepens as Roberto Sanchez Rejects Runoff Results 
The Trump administration has removed all members of the National Science Board, a major advisory group that oversees the National Science Foundation (NSF), according to statements from two former board members. The decision impacts more than 20 experts and has raised concerns about the future of independent scientific governance in the United States.
The National Science Board, established in 1950, plays a vital role in guiding U.S. science and engineering policy. Its members are typically appointed for six-year terms and come from diverse backgrounds, including academia, industry, nonprofits, and national laboratories. The board also advises both the president and Congress on key issues related to scientific research and innovation.
Yolanda Gil of the University of Southern California and Keivan Stassun of Vanderbilt University confirmed that all 22 members received an email on Friday notifying them of their immediate termination. Both stated that no reason was provided for the sudden dismissal. Gil highlighted the board’s diverse expertise, while Stassun noted that, although disappointing, the move was not entirely unexpected.
Experts believe the action reflects a broader strategy by the Trump administration, which began in early 2025, to reshape independent institutions. Critics argue that removing experienced board members and potentially replacing them with political allies could weaken objective scientific oversight and reduce critical input in policymaking.
The National Science Foundation referred questions to the White House. A White House official responded by suggesting that the board’s authority, established decades ago, may need to be updated. The official also emphasized that the NSF’s operations will continue without interruption.
This development has intensified discussions about the role of independent scientific bodies in the U.S., particularly their importance in ensuring unbiased, evidence-based policy decisions in science and technology.
