Match Group Inc. sued Google on what it calls the last resort to prevent Tinder and its other apps from being removed from the Play store for refusing to share up to 30 percent of their sales.
The dating apps maker's lawsuit follows ongoing cases brought by Epic Games, dozens of U.S. state attorneys general, and others in targeting Google's allegedly anticompetitive conduct with the Play store.
Google said Match was attempting to dodge paying for the significant value it receives. It added that t like any business, they charge for services and protect users against fraud.
Match's complaint accuses Google of breaking federal and state antitrust laws and aims to prohibit such behavior.
Some of Match's apps have been exempted from Google policies for about the past decade. Now, Google says it will block downloads of those apps by June 1 unless they solely offer its payment system and share revenue.
Match CEO Shar Dubey said they tried, in good faith to resolve these concerns with Google, but their insistence and threats left them without a choice.
Match is betting on hundreds of millions of dollars in income that would otherwise have to be paid to Google.
According to the lawsuit, the majority of Tinder users prefer Match's payment mechanism, which allows for installment plans, bank transfers, and other services not offered by Google.
Going around Play, according to Dubey, was unviable.


Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation
UK Employers Plan Moderate Pay Rises as Inflation Pressures Ease but Persist
Tesla Launches New Model Y Variant in the US Starting at $41,990
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery
IMF Forecasts Global Inflation Decline as Growth Remains Resilient
Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling
Saks Global to End Saks on Amazon Partnership Amid Bankruptcy Restructuring
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol Faces Historic Court Ruling Over Failed Martial Law Attempt
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Palantir Stock Jumps After Strong Q4 Earnings Beat and Upbeat 2026 Revenue Forecast
Using the Economic Calendar to Reduce Surprise Driven Losses in Forex
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Starmer’s China Visit Highlights Western Balancing Act Amid U.S.-China Rivalry 



