SK Broadband announced on Thursday, Sept. 30 that it had filed a countersuit against Netflix over network usage fees. It was reported that the lawsuit had been based on the court decision in June, which favored the Korean internet service provider.
In April, Netflix’s Korean unit sued SK Broadband and requested the court in Seoul to confirm that it is not its duty to pay the said usage fees concerning data traffic. In June, the court released its decision that ruled against Netflix in the dispute, and the streaming firm filed for an appeal in July.
The Seoul Central District Court rejected and dismissed Netflix’s request that states it has no obligation to pay network usage fees to SK Broadband. Thus, the appeal was filed in an effort to reverse the decision.
“There has never been a case globally where a court or a government forced content providers to pay for network fees,” Netflix said in a statement. “The decision may topple the global internet ecosystem developed by content providers and internet service providers.”
More than two months after Netflix filed its appeal, The Korea Herald reported that SK Broadband, one of the leading broadband internet providers in the country, heads to the Seoul High Court to countersue the streaming service provider.
This move was said to be a follow-up measure as Netflix did not respond to the broadband firm’s proposals. Likewise, SK Broadband went on to file its countersuit so it could finally claim fees for the use of its network so Netflix could provide its service in South Korea.
“Netflix is free-riding on our network that is provided at cost due to the huge spending in initial establishment and annual maintenance,” Pulse News quoted SK Broadband as saying regarding the case. It added that it has decided to countersue because, despite the ruling, Netflix continues to refuse to enter negotiations so they can reach an agreement.
SK Broadband stressed that as of September this year, Netflix Korea consumes around 1,200Gbps of traffic on its network. This number is said to be a big increase from May 2018, when it was only consuming 50Gbps.
The company further noted that maintaining this service for the streaming giant is definitely not for free. Finally, it was estimated that the network usage fee involved in the dispute could reach up to $84.4 million or ₩100 billion.


Golden Dome Missile Defense: Anduril and Palantir Join Forces on Trump's $185B Space Shield
Citi Names Eric Farina and Rob Cascarino to Lead Global Infrastructure Financing Group
Gold Prices Surge on U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Reports
Middle East War Rattles Global Markets as Oil Tops $100 and Dollar Surges
OpenAI Pulls the Plug on Sora, Ending $1 Billion Disney Partnership
Australia-EU Free Trade Deal Signed After Years of Negotiations
Innate Pharma Reports 55% Revenue Drop and €49.2M Net Loss for 2025
Finnair Orders 18 Embraer E195-E2 Jets in Landmark Fleet Overhaul
Reflection AI Eyes $25 Billion Valuation in Massive $2.5 Billion Funding Round
Asian Stocks Gain Amid Iran Conflict Uncertainty
CK Hutchison's Panama Ports Dispute Escalates as Arbitration Claims Surpass $2 Billion
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Explosion Prompts $1M Lawsuit Over Worker Safety Negligence
Wall Street Slides as Iran War Uncertainty, Oil Surge, and AI Fears Rattle Markets
Sonova Shares Slip as Hearing Aid Giant Lowers Growth Outlook and Plans Sennheiser Exit
Rio Tinto's Resolution Copper Mine: U.S. Smelting Challenges and Global Operations Update
AWS Bahrain Region Disrupted by Drone Activity Amid Middle East Conflict 



