U.S. Soldiers Killed in ISIS Attack in Palmyra, Syria During Counterterrorism Mission 
Environmental Group Sues to Block Trump Image on U.S. National Park Passes 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
U.S. Homeland Security Ends TSA Union Contract, Prompting Legal Challenge 
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise 
Bolsonaro’s Defense Requests Hospital Transfer and Humanitarian House Arrest 
Trump Signals Conditional Push for Ukraine Peace Talks as Frustration Mounts 
U.S. Appeals Court Rules Trump Can Remove Members of Key Federal Labor Boards 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
US Charges Two Men in Alleged Nvidia Chip Smuggling Scheme to China 
Belarus Pledges to Halt Smuggling Balloons Into Lithuania 
Trump Administration Fuel-Efficiency Rollback Could Raise Long-Term Costs for U.S. Drivers 
Malaysia Airlines Ordered to Compensate Families of MH370 Passengers 
Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders 
A U.S. federal judge ruled the government violated a court order by attempting to deport six migrants to South Sudan without adequate notice, intensifying tensions between the judiciary and President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.
Judge Brian Murphy said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defied his April injunction, which required officials to give migrants a chance to voice safety concerns before being deported to a third country. DHS gave less than 24 hours' notice before loading the migrants onto a plane—deemed “plainly insufficient” by Murphy, who mandated a 10-day notice period moving forward.
The six deportees, from countries including Cuba, Laos, and Myanmar, had been convicted of serious crimes. Still, immigrant rights groups argue that deporting them to war-torn South Sudan without due process violates constitutional protections.
The Biden-appointed judge criticized the DHS for ignoring court directives and warned of possible criminal contempt charges. Despite pressure, Murphy allowed the DHS to keep the migrants abroad for now but required 72-hour interview notice and 15 days to appeal if deportation fears are dismissed.
The White House called Murphy a "far-left activist judge," and DHS described his ruling as "deranged," sparking backlash. Trump advisor Stephen Miller claimed Murphy endangered personnel by interfering with national security.
This case mirrors other legal clashes, including Judge Boasberg’s paused contempt probe over deported Venezuelans and Judge Xinis’s unresolved case involving a deported Maryland resident.
Advocates argue Trump’s immigration crackdown disregards legal norms, with courts repeatedly stepping in to ensure due process. As South Sudan authorities suggest re-deporting the men, Murphy demanded a declaration explaining how U.S. actions comply with international legal standards.
This ruling underscores the legal limits facing Trump’s renewed deportation push amid broader constitutional debates.
