X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers 
White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries 
New Mexico Measles Outbreak Cost Reached $5.4 Million, Study Finds 
UK AI Security Tests Reveal Anthropic and OpenAI Agents Attempted Unauthorized Actions 
New Zealand MMP Electoral System Faces Fresh Referendum Debate 
Brazil Rejects Visas for Trump Officials Ahead of Presidential Election 
FCC Moves to Ban Imports of Foreign Military-Grade Drones Over Security Risks 
EEOC Drops Penn Subpoena in Antisemitism Probe, Investigation Continues 
Trump Orders Section 301 Probe Into EU Tech Fines, Signals New Tariffs 
Trump Administration Weighs Executive Order on Vaccines and Autism Research 
Russia Charges Telegram Founder Pavel Durov With Facilitating Terrorism, Seeks International Arrest 
Brazil Supreme Court Approves Probe Into Lula’s Son Over Health Ministry Lobbying Claims 
Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts 
Bezalel Smotrich Faces Election Battle as Israel’s Far-Right Vote Fractures 
Judge Approves Anthropic’s $1.5 Billion AI Copyright Settlement With Authors 
Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Democratic Senate Primary, Sets Up Key Midterm Showdown 
A U.S. federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from tying transportation funding to immigration enforcement compliance. On Thursday, Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island ruled that the U.S. Department of Transportation lacked legal authority to demand cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a condition for federal transportation grants.
The decision came after 20 Democratic-led states sued the administration, arguing that the policy unlawfully pressured them to align with Trump’s hardline immigration agenda. These states, along with their cities and counties, opposed the April 24 directive by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, which threatened to withhold funding unless local governments assisted federal immigration officers.
Judge McConnell, an Obama appointee, issued a preliminary injunction, emphasizing that there was no legitimate connection between immigration cooperation and the congressional purpose of the grants—namely, infrastructure development like highways and bridges. He wrote that Congress did not give the Transportation Secretary the authority to impose such immigration-related conditions.
Since returning to office on January 20, Trump had signed multiple executive orders aimed at penalizing sanctuary jurisdictions—areas that limit cooperation with ICE—by cutting off federal funds. The lawsuit is part of a broader legal pushback against these executive actions.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the ruling, calling it a win for state rights and infrastructure development. “Trump was using transportation funds as leverage to force compliance with his immigration policies,” Bonta said.
The 20 states are also pursuing a related case challenging similar restrictions imposed by the Department of Homeland Security on other federal grant programs.
This ruling reinforces legal limits on federal power to coerce states on immigration enforcement and underscores the ongoing legal clash between sanctuary policies and federal mandates.
