Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites 
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings 
Asian Stocks Mixed as South Korea Slides on Profit-Taking, Japan and China Gain on Strong Factory Data 
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks 
Trump Reports $1.4 Billion in Crypto Income as Digital Assets Become Top Wealth Source 
Colombia Opens New Investigation Into Former President Álvaro Uribe Over Paramilitary Allegations 
The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize 
Britain has almost 1 million young people not in work or education – here’s what evidence shows can change that 
Gold Price Hits Annual Low as Fed Rate Hike Bets and Sticky Inflation Weigh on Bullion 
US Dollar Rises as Fed Rate Outlook Stays Hawkish, Euro Slips and Yen Near 40-Year Low 
The pandemic is still disrupting young people’s careers 
Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions 
6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash 
Pedro Sanchez’s Wife Ordered to Stand Trial in Spain Corruption Case 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
