Waymo Issues Recall After Reports of Self-Driving Cars Illegally Passing School Buses in Texas 
BOJ Faces Pressure for Clarity, but Neutral Rate Estimates Likely to Stay Vague 
Why have so few atrocities ever been recognised as genocide? 
Netflix’s $72 Billion Warner Bros Discovery Deal Reshapes the Entertainment Landscape 
Dollar Slides to Five-Week Low as Asian Stocks Struggle and Markets Bet on Fed Rate Cut 
Proxy Advisors Urge Vote Against ANZ’s Executive Pay Report Amid Scandal Fallout 
European Oil & Gas Stocks Face 2026 With Cautious Outlook Amid Valuation Pressure 
Appeals Court Blocks Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations in the U.S. 
IMF Deputy Dan Katz Visits China as Key Economic Review Nears 
Asian Currencies Steady as Rupee Hits Record Low Amid Fed Rate Cut Bets 
Disaster or digital spectacle? The dangers of using floods to create social media content 
Spirit Airlines Reverses Pilot Furlough Plans Amid Updated Staffing Outlook 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
Citi Sets Bullish 2026 Target for STOXX 600 as Fiscal Support and Monetary Easing Boost Outlook 
Asia’s IPO Market Set for Strong Growth as China and India Drive Investor Diversification 
Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
