SpaceX Reports $8 Billion Profit as IPO Plans and Starlink Growth Fuel Valuation Buzz 
Using the Economic Calendar to Reduce Surprise Driven Losses in Forex 
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages 
South Korea Factory Activity Hits 18-Month High as Export Demand Surges 
EU Recovery Fund Faces Bottlenecks Despite Driving Digital and Green Projects 
South Korea Inflation Hits Five-Month Low as CPI Reaches Central Bank Target 
Citigroup Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Sexual Harassment by Top Wealth Executive 
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations 
Trump Threatens Aircraft Tariffs as U.S.-Canada Jet Certification Dispute Escalates 
Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits 
How to support someone who is grieving: five research-backed strategies 
Sam Altman Reaffirms OpenAI’s Long-Term Commitment to NVIDIA Amid Chip Report 
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
