U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices 
The ghost of Robodebt – Federal Court rules billions of dollars in welfare debts must be recalculated 
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 
Can your cat recognise you by scent? New study shows it’s likely 
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back 
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record 
Singapore Budget 2026 Set for Fiscal Prudence as Growth Remains Resilient 
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize 
Jack Daniel's will bring to the Supreme Court a dog toy dispute that began in 2014 when it sent a cease-and-desist letter to VIP Products over their "Bad Spaniels" dog toy.
A ripoff of a Jack Daniel's bottle, the toy dog had a label stating, among other jokes, "The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet."
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bad Spaniels is a parody, which would typically be protected by the First Amendment, in overturning a previous judgment that VIP Products infringed on Jack Daniel's trademark.
Jack Daniel's contention in petitioning the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was whether the right to parody still applies where the parody is itself a product and could cause issues in the marketplace.
Lisa Blatt, the lead attorney for Jack Daniel's, said VIP's profit-motivated 'joke' confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel's hard-earned goodwill.
On the other hand, Bennett Cooper, a lawyer for VIP Products, said they have “a good test case to create a national standard."
