President Donald Trump is someone who demands absolute loyalty, or someone who agrees with him all the time. Recently, the President announced that they were going to sue the New York Times for libel on the opinion piece regarding Russian relations.
Trump is suing the publication for supposed defamation as they reportedly made a false report that there was a connection between his reelection campaign and Russia. The Russian government and oligarchy reportedly helped Trump and his campaign in exchange for preferential treatment as well as respect for the sanctions from issues related to the two countries.
Although Trump is planning to sue and has already issued a statement that they are suing, on the other end of the spectrum, this will allow the New York Times to actually conduct an investigation to see if the content in the op-ed piece were actually true or false. The Times will now be able to ask whoever they want, and that will also include deposing Trump’s own family, his three eldest children in particular, who are also his political advisors. The Times will also be able to demand records of phone conversations, travel records, in order to ensure that the truth comes out.
As well, the New York Times will also get a chance to file a countersuit for the times that Trump has attacked them on social media as well. Should the New York Times file a countersuit, it will prevent the Trump campaign from dismissing the case in its entirety, something they, Trump and company, seem to think they can do because they somehow are above the law.
In response to the lawsuit, the New York Times spokesperson said, “The Trump campaign has turned to the courts to punish an opinion writer for having an opinion they find unacceptable. Fortunately, the law protects the rights of Americans to express their judgments and conclusions, especially about events of public importance. We look forward to vindicating that right in this case.”
The piece in question was written back in March of 2019, by former executive editor Max Frankel. The piece argued that Trump’s campaign and Russian President Vladimir Putin had an “overarching deal” and that meant that the Russians would help in the campaign against Trump’s then-presidential rival Hillary Clinton, a new foreign policy that is pro-Russia, and removal of the sanctions placed on Russia.


Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Ohio Man Indicted for Alleged Threat Against Vice President JD Vance, Faces Additional Federal Charges
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
U.S. to Begin Paying UN Dues as Financial Crisis Spurs Push for Reforms
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
U.S. Lawmakers to Review Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein DOJ Files Starting Monday
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out 



