Senate Majority Leader John Thune Moves to Advance Crypto Clarity Act 
Mark Carney Jokes About Teleprompter, Takes Swipe at Trump 
US Expands Social Media Vetting to Foreign Journalists Seeking Visas 
US-Backed Venezuela Government, Opposition Talks Begin 
Russian Strikes on Ukraine Kill Six, Wound Dozens in Balakliia and Sumy 
Trump Unveils $3 Billion U.S. Critical Minerals Push 
US Continues Ukraine Patriot Missile Production Talks Despite Trump Doubts 
Iran-Oman Near Strait of Hormuz Deal as Shipping Tensions Persist 
North Korea May Deploy 120 Missiles to Russia 
Ukraine Agrees to Protect Kazakhstan Oil Exports via Black Sea 
Canada, US Hold Constructive Trade Talks as Tariff Negotiations Continue 
Taiwan President Lai Oversees Coastal Strike Drills in Han Kuang War Games 
Zelensky Urges Faster NATO Action on Air Defense Missiles 
U.S. Unseals Charges Against Five Alleged CJNG Leaders, Raises Reward for New Cartel Chief 
New Zealand MMP Electoral System Faces Fresh Referendum Debate 
Rubio, UK’s Miliband Stress Stronger European Security Role in Washington Talks 
Colombia President Abelardo De La Espriella Pledges Drug Crackdown, Economic Reforms 
President Donald Trump is someone who demands absolute loyalty, or someone who agrees with him all the time. Recently, the President announced that they were going to sue the New York Times for libel on the opinion piece regarding Russian relations.
Trump is suing the publication for supposed defamation as they reportedly made a false report that there was a connection between his reelection campaign and Russia. The Russian government and oligarchy reportedly helped Trump and his campaign in exchange for preferential treatment as well as respect for the sanctions from issues related to the two countries.
Although Trump is planning to sue and has already issued a statement that they are suing, on the other end of the spectrum, this will allow the New York Times to actually conduct an investigation to see if the content in the op-ed piece were actually true or false. The Times will now be able to ask whoever they want, and that will also include deposing Trump’s own family, his three eldest children in particular, who are also his political advisors. The Times will also be able to demand records of phone conversations, travel records, in order to ensure that the truth comes out.
As well, the New York Times will also get a chance to file a countersuit for the times that Trump has attacked them on social media as well. Should the New York Times file a countersuit, it will prevent the Trump campaign from dismissing the case in its entirety, something they, Trump and company, seem to think they can do because they somehow are above the law.
In response to the lawsuit, the New York Times spokesperson said, “The Trump campaign has turned to the courts to punish an opinion writer for having an opinion they find unacceptable. Fortunately, the law protects the rights of Americans to express their judgments and conclusions, especially about events of public importance. We look forward to vindicating that right in this case.”
The piece in question was written back in March of 2019, by former executive editor Max Frankel. The piece argued that Trump’s campaign and Russian President Vladimir Putin had an “overarching deal” and that meant that the Russians would help in the campaign against Trump’s then-presidential rival Hillary Clinton, a new foreign policy that is pro-Russia, and removal of the sanctions placed on Russia.
