Disability rights organizations and Social Security recipients have filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration and billionaire Elon Musk, accusing them of illegally slashing the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) workforce and shutting down critical offices. Filed in Washington, D.C., the lawsuit claims that the mass layoffs and closures violate constitutional rights and federal disability laws.
Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency is at the center of the controversy, having led a sweeping campaign to reduce federal employment and cut costs. Around 7,000 SSA employees were reportedly fired, and several offices that handled civil rights complaints and beneficiary services were closed.
Plaintiffs argue these actions disproportionately harm people with disabilities, infringing on their rights under the U.S. Constitution and the Rehabilitation Act. They allege the cuts are “arbitrary and capricious” and obstruct access to vital services for elderly and disabled Americans. The SSA currently serves 73 million people, providing monthly benefits that are essential for financial survival.
The lawsuit seeks to block further office closures, prevent the termination of more SSA staff, and halt rules requiring some beneficiaries to verify their identity in person—a move critics say imposes undue burdens on vulnerable populations.
Last week, the SSA reversed a plan to cut phone services and scrapped the in-person identity rule after public backlash. However, disability advocates say more must be done to restore critical services and ensure fair treatment for all beneficiaries.
The White House and SSA have not commented on the lawsuit.
This legal battle highlights growing concerns over the privatization and downsizing of essential federal agencies, particularly those serving the most vulnerable. The case could set a major precedent for protecting the rights of disabled Americans amid sweeping government reforms.


Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Panama Supreme Court Voids Hong Kong Firm’s Panama Canal Port Contracts Over Constitutional Violations
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
New York Judge Orders Redrawing of GOP-Held Congressional District
Iran–U.S. Nuclear Talks in Oman Face Major Hurdles Amid Rising Regional Tensions
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Marco Rubio Steps Down as Acting U.S. Archivist Amid Federal Law Limits
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 



