A U.S. federal appeals court has lifted an injunction that blocked the Trump administration from limiting collective bargaining rights for hundreds of thousands of federal employees. The 2-1 ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court allows enforcement of a controversial executive order signed by President Donald Trump in March, which strips union rights from workers at key federal agencies, citing national security concerns.
The order impacts employees at the Departments of Justice, State, Defense, Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and Health and Human Services. It affects about 75% of the 1 million federal workers represented by unions, including around 100,000 members of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU). The NTEU challenged the order, arguing it violated federal labor rights and the Constitution.
However, the appeals court's majority, including Judges Karen Henderson and Justin Walker, said the union failed to prove irreparable harm and emphasized that the president’s authority in national security matters is in the public interest. The court supported Trump’s use of a national security exemption, asserting that preserving executive autonomy under existing statutes was critical.
Judge J. Michelle Childs dissented, criticizing the administration for offering only vague national security claims to justify the policy change. The ruling allows the Trump-era executive order to take effect, limiting collective bargaining for employees in positions tied to intelligence and national defense functions.
The White House and NTEU have not yet commented on the decision. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is pursuing additional legal action to void existing union contracts affecting thousands more federal workers.
This decision marks a major development in federal labor relations, highlighting the ongoing debate over national security and union rights in the U.S. government workforce.


Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Trump Signs “America First Arms Transfer Strategy” to Prioritize U.S. Weapons Sales
Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 



