Mexico Antitrust Review of Viva Aerobus–Volaris Deal Signals Growth for Airline Sector 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training 
Seatrium Reaches $475 Million Settlement With Maersk Over Offshore Wind Vessel Project 
Novo Nordisk Stock Surges After FDA Approves Wegovy Pill for Weight Loss 
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
Warner Bros Discovery Weighs Amended Paramount Skydance Bid as Netflix Takeover Battle Intensifies 
ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants 
California Regulator Probes Waymo Robotaxi Stalls During San Francisco Power Outage 
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown 
Google and Apple Warn U.S. Visa Holders to Avoid International Travel Amid Lengthy Embassy Delays 
Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
Niigata Set to Approve Restart of Japan’s Largest Nuclear Power Plant in Major Energy Shift 
Bridgewater Associates Plans Major Employee Ownership Expansion in Milestone Year 
FTC Praises Instacart for Ending AI Pricing Tests After $60M Settlement 
BELLEVUE, Wash., Dec. 06, 2016 -- Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal,” the “Company”) (OTCQB:VPLM) filed yesterday two Requests for Rehearing (“Requests”) with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The Requests ask the PTAB to reconsider its November 21, 2016 Decisions granting institution of Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), IPR2016-01201 and IPR2016-1198, filed by Apple Inc. ("Apple") against Voip-Pal’s RBR Patents (Patent Nos. 8,542,815 and 9,179,005).
In its Requests, Voip-Pal points out the PTAB’s Decisions clearly overlooked that the challenged claims require a specific ordering of steps, yet the Apple Petitions fail to use a claim construction that accounts for this ordering of steps. The Decisions also overlooked that the Petitioner incorrectly ascribed, without evidence, an alleged deficiency to the primary reference as its key motivation to combine the primary reference with the secondary references. Both of these oversights in the Decisions were clearly set forth in the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response but were not addressed by the PTAB in its Decision. In view of these oversights, Voip-Pal believes the PTAB should reconsider its decisions and deny Inter Partes Review of the RBR Patents.
Emil Malak, CEO of Voip-Pal said, “While we recognize the Board is often reluctant to reconsider its decisions, in the present case we believe that the Board has genuinely overlooked two “fundamental arguments” out of multiple arguments presented in our Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response."
“We have now clarified these overlooked arguments and we believe the PTAB should vacate their earlier decision to institute."
“We very much appreciate the support of our shareholders.”
The Company’s Request for Rehearing can be viewed at http://www.voip-pal.com/recent-filings.
About Voip-Pal.com Inc.
Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. (“Voip-Pal”) is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB:VPLM) headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. The Company owns a portfolio of patents relating to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology that it is currently looking to monetize.
Corporate Website: www.voip-pal.com IR inquiries: [email protected] IR Contact: Rich Inza (954) 495-4600
