A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


SK Hynix, Samsung Lead Asian Chip Stock Selloff After Sandisk, Western Digital Outlook
Nintendo Shares Jump as Switch 2 Sales Boost Earnings
SK Hynix Bonus Dispute Deepens as Union Rejects Stock-Based Payout Proposal
Apple Restores Telegram to App Store After Content Policy Violation
Western Digital Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as FY2027 Outlook Tops Expectations
Cloudflare Stock Jumps 15% as Earnings Beat Estimates, 2026 Outlook Raised
Telegram Restored on Apple App Store After Temporary Removal
Alphabet Stock Slides as Google AI Pioneer Jeff Dean Exits to Launch Discovery Loop
Nvidia to Invest Up to $3 Billion in Blackstone-Backed Lancium
Vast Eyes Hong Kong IPO as Chinese AI Unicorn Gains Momentum
Alibaba Stock Jumps as Qwen 3.8-MAX AI Model Intensifies China's AI Race
DeepSeek to Raise AI API Prices as Demand for New Models Surges
SpaceX Targets Starship Flight 14 With First V3 Starlink Satellite Launch
OpenAI Restricts Astra AI Over Cyberattack Risks
SoftBank Q1 Profit Beats Forecast as Intel Rally and OpenAI Investments Boost Returns
Infineon Raises 2026 Revenue Outlook as AI Data Center Demand Fuels Record Quarterly Sales 



