After years of legal fighting and taking the battle to the highest court in the U.S., Samsung emerges victorious over Apple. In a unanimous decision, the justices presiding over the case stressed that the patent infringement only applied to the particular parts of the product instead of the whole thing. As a result, Samsung will not have to pay the $399 million in damages that Apple is suing for.
The ruling to favor Samsung was 8-0, Reuters reports, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying that those found guilty of violating certain design patents are not always required to pay out everything that they made while committing the infringement. In the case of Samsung, the infringement only applies to some of the components of its smartphones and not every single product that uses said components.
On that note, this also means that Samsung is not getting off scot-free. The South Korean company will still need to pay its American counterpart. It’s just not going to be as much as Apple was asking for.
The case has since been directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, where the amount that Samsung will need to pay Apple will be decided. By all accounts, it would seem that the iPhone maker is only going to be receiving a pittance compared to the original asking price.
The effects of this ruling have a far-reaching impact on the tech industry and the patent industry as a whole, CNET reports. It essentially changed how design patent lawsuits are going to be approached from now on and how much the offending party will need to pay out.
For companies that were outright robbed of patents that they were applying to their products, this could be a disaster. When it comes to the so-called patent trolls, however, this could be a huge turning point that benefits the tech industry.


SK Hynix Labeled “Investment Warning Stock” After Extraordinary 200% Share Surge
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns
EssilorLuxottica Bets on AI-Powered Smart Glasses as Competition Intensifies
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
Nvidia Weighs Expanding H200 AI Chip Production as China Demand Surges
U.S. Homeland Security Ends TSA Union Contract, Prompting Legal Challenge
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Microsoft Unveils Massive Global AI Investments, Prioritizing India’s Rapidly Growing Digital Market 



