ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants 
Bridgewater Associates Plans Major Employee Ownership Expansion in Milestone Year 
Uber and Baidu Partner to Test Robotaxis in the UK, Marking a New Milestone for Autonomous Ride-Hailing 
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training 
Seatrium Reaches $475 Million Settlement With Maersk Over Offshore Wind Vessel Project 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Novo Nordisk Stock Surges After FDA Approves Wegovy Pill for Weight Loss 
FTC Praises Instacart for Ending AI Pricing Tests After $60M Settlement 
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
Moore Threads Unveils New GPUs, Fuels Optimism Around China’s AI Chip Ambitions 
AstraZeneca’s LATIFY Phase III Trial of Ceralasertib Misses Primary Endpoint in Lung Cancer Study 
Mexico Antitrust Review of Viva Aerobus–Volaris Deal Signals Growth for Airline Sector 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement 
Warner Bros Discovery Weighs Amended Paramount Skydance Bid as Netflix Takeover Battle Intensifies 
TUCSON, Ariz., Oct. 17, 2016 -- The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed suit in U.S. District Court on Friday asking the Court to block California AB 72, the so-called “Surprise Medical Bill” law signed last month by Governor Jerry Brown.
“This new law gives insurance bureaucrats the power to decide what out-of-network physicians can be paid for life-saving medical care,” said AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly. “Independent doctors, already under attack from all directions, could be forced to shut their doors. Patients are already having trouble finding doctors, and this scheme will only exacerbate the physician shortage.”
A few other states have passed balance-billing bans that limit patients’ out-of-pocket costs, but none are as heavy-handed as AB 72, which limits the amount that insurance companies may be billed, Schlafly notes.
The Complaint launching AAPS vs. Brown, No. 2:16-cv-02441, filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, states that the law violates the U.S. and California Constitutions in at least three ways:
First, the Act violates the Due Process Clauses of the U.S. and California Constitutions by delegating rate-setting authority to private insurance companies, with respect to physicians who are not under any contract with the insurance companies. In addition, the Act is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clauses by requiring arbitration for the out-of-network physicians on their reimbursements, thereby denying them their due process rights in court on their claims.
Second, the Act violates the Takings Clauses of the U.S. and California Constitutions because the Act empowers private insurance companies to deprive out-of-network physicians of the market value for their services, and arbitrarily denies them just compensation for their labor.
Third, the Act violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. and California Constitutions by having a disparate impact on minority patients for whom the availability of medical care will sharply decline as out-of-network physicians are coerced by the Act to withdraw services from predominantly minority communities.
The full Complaint is available.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in virtually all specialties and every state. Founded in 1943, AAPS has the motto “omnia pro aegroto,” which means “all for the patient.”
Contact: Andrew Schlafly, Esq., (908) 719-8608, [email protected], or Jane M. Orient, M.D., (520) 323-3110, [email protected]
