EU elections: far-right parties surge, but less than had been expected 
Four tips to avoid being bamboozled by political statistics and data 
Mexico elects first female president 
Mexico: why Sheinbaum’s historic election may not translate to gender equality 
Indian election: Narendra Modi hasn’t delivered the expected landslide – where the BJP may have gone wrong 
Unmarred by Russian spying scandal, Austria’s far-right expected to cruise to victory in European elections 
Three ways politicians always promise to raise money without increasing taxes – and why they rarely deliver 
Does voting help the climate? 
Iran: meet the men – and women – lining up to contest the early presidential election 
Iran: president’s death has set hardliners jostling for position to replace ageing supreme leader 
The Conservatives are pledging a ‘triple lock plus’ for UK pensioners – here’s what it means 
Indian election: why Modi may now need to switch his economic ambitions to new businesses and small firms 
Trust hits new low: 45% of people think politicians put party before country 
Trump's 'Huge Fan' Status of Tesla Cybertruck Fuels Growing Alliance with Elon Musk 
A byelection to watch: What the Toronto-St. Paul’s vote means for Justin Trudeau 
Since taking office in January 2021, the Biden administration has seen an influx of migrants looking to enter the United States. A federal appeals court recently ruled that expulsions at the border may continue, upholding a policy of Biden’s predecessor.
Friday last week, a federal appeals court ruled that the US can continue to expel migrants that are caught trying to cross the border between the US and Mexico. However, the court noted that the expulsion should be avoided if the migrant faces persecution or torture if sent back. The ruling mostly upholds a policy enacted under Donald Trump, who pursued a hardline stance on immigration.
This ruling comes as a group of affected asylum seekers and migrants represented by the ACLU and other non-profit organizations filed a lawsuit against Title 42, which has mostly been upheld by the Biden administration. Human rights groups argued that the expulsions were illegal. However, the panel of judges disagreed, saying that it is likely that those arrivals “have no right to be in the United States” and that the Executive could order their expulsions.
“The Executive cannot remove aliens to a country where their ‘life or freedom would be threatened’ on account of their ‘race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion,” or “to a country where they will likely be tortured,” said the court in its ruling.
ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt told CNN Friday that the ruling would put an end to Title 42 being used to expel those seeking asylum in the country.
In other related news, energy historian Daniel Yergin told Bloomberg that Biden must restore the government’s historical ties with the oil industry. Yergin explained that while Biden has asked OPEC to pump more crude in order to ease gas and energy prices, he has yet to make the same gestures to the local industry.
Yergin went on to explain that as energy prices continue to rise, Biden’s administration must work closely with producers, especially at this time with the crisis in Ukraine.
“It’s now time to build those channels of communication and it has to come from the government reaching out in a non-confrontational way,” said Yergin. “Energy security fell off the table in the US as we became self-sufficient in energy, and in fact, it was like amnesia. It was not only taken for granted, it’s just forgotten.”
