OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Nov. 29, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against StoneMor Partners, L.P. (“StoneMor” or the “Company”) (NYSE:STON) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of purchasers of common stock of StoneMor between January 19, 2012 through October 27, 2016 (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pursuant to the Complaint, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company’s reported non-GAAP financial metrics were materially misleading and concealed the truth about the Company’s actual financial condition; and (2) the primary purpose of the Company’s regular debt and equity offerings was to pay distributions to unitholders rather than to pay down indebtedness under the Company’s revolving credit facility as publicly stated. The Complaint further alleges that on September 2, 2016 the Company disclosed that it intended to restate its consolidated financial statements “to correct certain accounting errors.”
On October 27, 2016, the Company announced a quarterly cash distribution of $0.33 per common unit -- a 50% reduction from the prior quarter’s cash distribution. Following this news, shares of the Company’s common units fell $11.08 per share, or nearly 45%, to close on October 28, 2016 at $13.74 per common unit, on heavy trading volume.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 20, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
