Anthropic Appoints Former Microsoft Executive Irina Ghose to Lead India Expansion 
One Percent Rule Checklist For Safer Forex Trading Risk 
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling 
TSMC Shares Hit Record High as AI Chip Demand Fuels Strong Q4 Earnings 
China’s AI Models Narrow the Gap With the West, Says Google DeepMind CEO 
China Considers New Rules to Limit Purchases of Foreign AI Chips Amid Growing Demand 
Microsoft Strikes Landmark Soil Carbon Credit Deal With Indigo Carbon to Boost Carbon-Negative Goal 
Trump Criticizes NYSE Texas Expansion, Calls Dallas Exchange a Blow to New York 
Syrah Resources and Tesla Extend Deadline on Graphite Supply Dispute to March 
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production 
Proposed Rio Tinto–Glencore Merger Faces China Regulatory Hurdles and Asset Sale Pressure 
U.S. Transportation Board Sends Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger Back for Revision 
U.S. Moves to Expand Chevron License and Control Venezuelan Oil Sales 
Sanofi Gains China Approval for Myqorzo and Redemplo, Strengthening Rare Disease Portfolio 
Boeing Reaches Tentative Labor Deal With SPEEA Workers After Spirit AeroSystems Acquisition 
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement 
CLEVELAND, April 20, 2017 -- A jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio returned a unanimous decision on Tuesday finding that thousands of American Family Mutual Insurance (“AmFam”) agents are actually employees. After a two-week trial, the jury found that the nation’s third largest property and casualty insurance company improperly classified its agents as independent contractors.
“The jury apparently agreed that AmFam cannot have it both ways,” said attorney Erin K. Dickinson of Crueger Dickinson, LLC (Madison, WI). “A company cannot just call its agents ‘independent contractors’ to avoid following the federal law protecting retirement benefits and then insist on controlling how those agents do their work.”
The case (Jammal, et al. v. American Family Insurance, Case No.: 13-cv-00437) centered on the allegation that AmFam avoids complying with ERISA, the federal law that protects retirement benefits, by improperly classifying its agents as independent contractors when they are actually employees. The Honorable Donald Nugent certified the case as a class action and presided over the advisory jury trial. AmFam is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.
“There is a lot at stake for AmFam agents who have been wrongfully deprived of retirement benefits,” said attorney Charles J. Crueger. “We look forward to the next phase of the case.”
Crueger, Dickinson, and attorney Ed Wallace of Wexler Wallace, LLP (Chicago, Illinois) served as trial counsel for the class of AmFam agents. The jury’s decision is advisory. Judge Nugent must now decide whether to adopt the jury’s conclusion and issue a formal ruling. If adopted, the case would proceed to a remedy phase to restore and protect retirement benefits for 6,978 current and former AmFam agents across the country.
“This was an incredibly hard-fought trial with a lot at stake for AmFam agents who have been wrongfully deprived of retirement benefits,” said attorney Ed Wallace of Wexler Wallace, LLP (Chicago, Illinois). “We are very pleased that the jury so carefully evaluated the substantial evidence supporting this verdict.”
In addition to the trial counsel team, the Plaintiffs were also represented by Kara A. Elgersma of Wexler Wallace LLP, Jack Landskroner and Drew Legando of Landskroner Grieco Merriman, LLC (Cleveland, Ohio), and Gregory F. Coleman of Greg Coleman Law PC (Knoxville, TN).
For more information, contact: Contact: Erin Dickinson at 414-236-5864 or email at [email protected]
