Donald Trump’s First Term Would Have ‘Destroyed America’ If He Wanted, Kamala Harris Faces Scrutiny for Lack of Impact in Joe Biden’s First Term

As America inches closer to the 2024 presidential election, the political discourse surrounding the achievements—or lack thereof—of both former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris has grown more polarized. Trump’s critics argue that his controversial policies and leadership style would have already wreaked irreversible harm on the country if that had been his true intent during his first term. On the other hand, Vice President Harris is under scrutiny for failing to make substantial changes that many voters expected when she and President Joe Biden assumed office.

Throughout Trump’s four years in office, the former president faced numerous accusations of undermining democratic institutions, inflaming racial tensions, and leading divisive foreign policy initiatives. However, despite these criticisms, many of his supporters contend that Trump’s administration achieved economic growth, secured borders, and reduced regulation—all without causing the widespread catastrophe his detractors feared. His policies, particularly on immigration and tax reform, were heralded by some as protective measures to safeguard American jobs and strengthen the economy. Still, Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his role in inciting the January 6 Capitol riot remain central arguments for those who insist he was a danger to the country's future.

Opponents, however, suggest that if Trump’s presidency had truly been about dismantling American democracy, he would have done so during his first term. Despite unprecedented challenges, including two impeachments and relentless controversy, Trump left office without fundamentally altering the pillars of the U.S. government. These critiques suggest that while Trump’s rhetoric may have been aggressive, his policies did not result in the nationwide collapse predicted by some political analysts.

In contrast, Kamala Harris, once hailed as a trailblazer for women and minorities, has faced disappointment from voters on both sides of the aisle who argue she has had a limited impact since taking office. Harris was initially seen as a key figure to support Biden on key initiatives such as immigration reform, voting rights, and criminal justice overhaul. Yet, nearly four years into the Biden-Harris administration, many of these promises remain unfulfilled. The Vice President has been criticized for her handling of the southern border crisis and perceived lack of leadership on the administration's core policy issues.

Harris’ detractors argue that if she were going to bring about the sweeping changes she promised, much like Trump's critics argue about his term, she would have already done so. Some Democratic voters have expressed concern that Harris has been sidelined on major initiatives, leaving them questioning whether she can deliver on the promises made during the 2020 campaign. Others speculate that the VP role traditionally lacks the executive power to enact sweeping reforms, and Harris has not had the authority to make the changes that voters expected.

As the 2024 election nears, both Trump and Harris will face further scrutiny about their time in office. Trump will attempt to regain his momentum among Republican voters, while Harris will need to prove that her first term in office wasn’t just a missed opportunity for progress.

EconoTimes cannot independently verify the rumor or all claims made about Donald Trump’s and Kamala Harris' terms in office. The information reflects ongoing public debate and commentary from both sides of the political spectrum.

This reflection on their respective tenures reveals the ongoing divide in American politics, where differing perceptions of leadership and impact will continue to shape voter sentiment heading into the next election.