Five Democratic-led states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) froze their access to more than $10 billion in federal childcare and family assistance funds. The legal challenge, filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan by California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York, argues that the funding freeze is unlawful, politically motivated, and harmful to low-income families who rely on federal support programs.
The dispute began after HHS announced on Tuesday that it had restricted the states’ access to federal funds pending further review, citing concerns over alleged fraud and misuse in state-administered welfare systems. The frozen funding includes approximately $7.3 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, nearly $2.4 billion from the Child Care and Development Fund, and an additional $869 million in social services block grants. These programs are overseen by the Administration for Children and Families, a division within HHS.
According to the agency, the decision was based on what it described as “widespread fraud” and the potential that individuals who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents may have improperly received benefits. The action follows a similar move a week earlier, when HHS froze $185 million in annual childcare funding allocated to Minnesota amid allegations of fraud in the state’s social services programs.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recently announced he will not seek a third term, stating that he intends to focus on addressing the fraud controversy. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders across the affected states have strongly criticized the funding freeze. New York Governor Kathy Hochul labeled the move “vindictive,” while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker described it as “wrong and cruel.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, said the administration is using essential family assistance funds as a political weapon. The lawsuit claims HHS failed to provide credible evidence supporting its fraud allegations, lacked legal authority to halt congressionally approved funding, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on Congress’s control over federal spending.


HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures
Trump to Meet Zelenskiy at NATO Summit in Turkey to Push Ukraine Peace Efforts
Khamenei Funeral Draws Thousands as Iran Stages Nationwide Week of Mourning
Trump Threatens ABC News Lawsuit Over Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Coverage
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites
Khamenei Funeral Draws Massive Crowds as Iran’s New Supreme Leader Remains Absent
Russia Strikes Kyiv as Ukraine Faces Patriot Missile Shortage Before NATO Summit
US Ambassador Prioritizes Cook Islands Critical Minerals, Warns of China’s Pacific Influence
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court
France Battles Mediterranean Wildfires as Heatwave Fuels Fire Risk
US Appeals Court Limits ICE Detention Without Bond Hearings After 90 Days
Israel Cabinet Rejects Supreme Court Ruling, Sparking Constitutional Crisis Fears
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial Opens, Putting 2028 Philippine Election in Focus
California Drivers Sue BP, Walmart, 7-Eleven Over Alleged AI Gas Price Fixing
Flavio Bolsonaro Urges Trump to Delay Brazil Tariffs Until After 2026 Election 



