Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
WILMINGTON, Del., Sept. 30, 2016 -- Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:
- Do you, or did you, own shares of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HAIN)?
- Did you purchase your shares between November 5, 2015 and August 15, 2016, inclusive?
- Did you lose money in your investment?
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. reminds shareholders of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (“Hain” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:HAIN) of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit commenced against the Company. A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Hain between November 5, 2015 and August 15, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”).
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements, and omitted materially adverse facts, about the Company’s business, operations and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that the defendants concealed from the investing public that: (1) the Company lacked adequate controls over financial reporting; (2) consequently, the Company failed to correctly account for revenue associated with concessions granted to certain distributors in the United States; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Hain’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. As a result of defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements, the Company’s stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than October 17, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Any member of the proposed class may move the court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
If you purchased shares of Hain during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold Hain, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120, Wilmington, DE 19803 at (888) 969-4242; by e-mail to [email protected]; or at: http://rigrodskylong.com/investigations/the-hain-celestial-group-inc-hain-lawsuit.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
CONTACT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire Peter Allocco (888) 969-4242 (516) 683-3516 Fax: (302) 654-7530 [email protected] http://www.rigrodskylong.com
