Norma Group Posts Revenue Decline in 2025, Eyes Modest Recovery in 2026 
Private Credit Under Pressure: Is a Slow-Motion Crisis Unfolding? 
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk 
Elon Musk Ties SpaceX IPO Access to Mandatory Grok AI Subscriptions 
Nike Beats Q3 Estimates but China Weakness and Margin Pressure Weigh on Outlook 
Microsoft's $10 Billion Japan Investment: AI Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Push 
TSMC Japan's Second Fab to Produce 3nm Chips by 2028 
UPS and Teamsters Reach Agreement to Limit Driver Severance Program 
UAE's Largest Natural Gas Facility Suspended After Attack-Triggered Fire 
First Western Ship Transits Strait of Hormuz Since Iran War Began 
Paramount Skydance Secures $24B from Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds for Warner Bros. Discovery Takeover 
RBC Capital: European Medtech Firms Show Minimal Middle East and Energy Risk Exposure 
Samsung Electronics Posts Eightfold Profit Surge Driven by AI Chip Demand 
SoftwareONE Posts 22.5% Revenue Surge in 2025 on Crayon Acquisition 
Trump Administration Plans 100% Tariffs on Pharmaceutical Imports 
Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads 
TAMPA BAY, Fla., Feb. 27, 2017 -- While the consequences of data breaches in many industries include public embarrassment, business loss and fines, an informal survey of Tampa Bay area law firms suggests that cyber-attacks in the legal profession also risk significant real and punitive damages, loss of clients and even potential closure of the firm itself.
The poll findings, based on confidential interviews by IT assurance and compliance firm 360 Advanced with six Tampa Bay managing partners, suggest that while most of the large, multi-national firms headquartered in Tampa Bay have what they believe are adequate defenses against cyber-attacks, smaller firms may not.
“They think they can’t afford to have those controls in place, but the alternative is much more costly. They have the same risks we do,” commented one principal with a large national Tampa law firm. She said her firm spends “an enormous amount energy and of money” on data security, both for the firm and its clients, and has invested even more recently as news of law firm breaches becomes more common. “This is only going to escalate as the bad guys follow the money,” she said.
Recent high-profile cyber-attack cases include a breach at Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca, where millions of documents detailing offshore client holdings were made public. Last fall, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced indictments of data thieves who had used stolen information on upcoming M&A deals to profit on the stock market.
Eric Ratcliffe, Director of Client Development at 360 Advanced, said because their client data can be held for ransom, targets for cyber-thieves also can include firms handling confidential financial settlements in divorce or federal tax cases, patent applications, critically sensitive personal injury and healthcare litigation, to name a few.
“We have a data privacy team dedicated to cyber defense and a secured operations center monitoring inbound threats,” commented a leading Bay Area attorney. “It’s a concern for everyone. Everyone is breachable. We are attractive targets.”
He pointed out that having an established, formal system of data protection that is regularly reviewed and tested can be a defense against a claim of liability, while the opposite is also true. “We prepare for the worst,” he said.
Another law firm principal, who is also a leading white collar crime expert, commented that a cyber-breach of a client matter destroys trust and will inevitably lead to client loss. “When private matters become public, the future of your firm may be at stake,” he said.
Contact: Eric Ratcliffe [email protected] 866.418.1708 ext.710
