Gulf Sovereign Funds Unite in Paramount–Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
ANZ Faces Legal Battle as Former CEO Shayne Elliott Sues Over A$13.5 Million Bonus Dispute 
SpaceX Edges Toward Landmark IPO as Elon Musk Confirms Plans 
Samsung SDI Secures Major LFP Battery Supply Deal in the U.S. 
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters 
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation 
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO 
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand 
JD.com Pledges 22 Billion Yuan Housing Support for Couriers as China’s Instant Retail Competition Heats Up 
Coca-Cola’s Costa Coffee Sale Faces Uncertainty as Talks With TDR Capital Hit Snag 
EssilorLuxottica Bets on AI-Powered Smart Glasses as Competition Intensifies 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 
Air Transat Reaches Tentative Agreement With Pilots, Avoids Strike and Restores Normal Operations 
TAMPA BAY, Fla., Feb. 27, 2017 -- While the consequences of data breaches in many industries include public embarrassment, business loss and fines, an informal survey of Tampa Bay area law firms suggests that cyber-attacks in the legal profession also risk significant real and punitive damages, loss of clients and even potential closure of the firm itself.
The poll findings, based on confidential interviews by IT assurance and compliance firm 360 Advanced with six Tampa Bay managing partners, suggest that while most of the large, multi-national firms headquartered in Tampa Bay have what they believe are adequate defenses against cyber-attacks, smaller firms may not.
“They think they can’t afford to have those controls in place, but the alternative is much more costly. They have the same risks we do,” commented one principal with a large national Tampa law firm. She said her firm spends “an enormous amount energy and of money” on data security, both for the firm and its clients, and has invested even more recently as news of law firm breaches becomes more common. “This is only going to escalate as the bad guys follow the money,” she said.
Recent high-profile cyber-attack cases include a breach at Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca, where millions of documents detailing offshore client holdings were made public. Last fall, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced indictments of data thieves who had used stolen information on upcoming M&A deals to profit on the stock market.
Eric Ratcliffe, Director of Client Development at 360 Advanced, said because their client data can be held for ransom, targets for cyber-thieves also can include firms handling confidential financial settlements in divorce or federal tax cases, patent applications, critically sensitive personal injury and healthcare litigation, to name a few.
“We have a data privacy team dedicated to cyber defense and a secured operations center monitoring inbound threats,” commented a leading Bay Area attorney. “It’s a concern for everyone. Everyone is breachable. We are attractive targets.”
He pointed out that having an established, formal system of data protection that is regularly reviewed and tested can be a defense against a claim of liability, while the opposite is also true. “We prepare for the worst,” he said.
Another law firm principal, who is also a leading white collar crime expert, commented that a cyber-breach of a client matter destroys trust and will inevitably lead to client loss. “When private matters become public, the future of your firm may be at stake,” he said.
Contact: Eric Ratcliffe [email protected] 866.418.1708 ext.710
