Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


Hantavirus Cruise Ship Outbreak Triggers Global Health Alert
Morgan Stanley Bets on Optical Component Stocks in Greater China Tech Sector
Broadcom Eyes $35 Billion AI Chip Financing Deal With Apollo and Blackstone
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit
Aker BP Q1 Profit Jumps on Higher Oil Prices and Asset Reversal
Orsted Q1 EBITDA Beats Expectations Despite U.S. Impairments
Armani Group Eyes Strategic Stake Sale to Luxury Giants
Reliance Industries Reworks Jio IPO Into Fresh Share Sale Amid Valuation Talks
Maersk Q1 Earnings Beat Expectations as Iran Conflict Clouds Shipping Outlook
CoreWeave Q1 2026 Revenue Surges as AI Infrastructure Demand Grows
Nintendo Shares Tumble as Weak Forecast and Rising Switch 2 Costs Worry Investors
Goldman Sachs Delays Fed Rate Cut Forecast to 2026 Amid Rising Inflation Concerns
Dell Stock Hits Record High After Trump Endorsement, AI Server Demand Fuels Rally
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case
Nike Tariff Refund Lawsuit Sparks Consumer Backlash Over Price Increases
Trump Invites Top CEOs Including Nvidia, Apple, Boeing to China Summit With Xi Jinping
Shell Q1 Profit Surges to Two-Year High as Dividend Rises Despite War-Driven Debt Pressure 



