Xiaomi may be allowed to do business again in the U.S. after the country’s federal court stopped the government from prohibiting the Americans from investing in the company. This means that the restrictions against the Chinese smartphone-maker have been lifted.
The root of the ban
Under Donald Trump’s administration, Xiaomi was added to the list of companies that allegedly have ties with the Chinese military. It was the state’s Defense Department that included the tech company in the list, and this resulted in the then-president’s decision to impose financial restrictions on the company.
This prohibited businesses in the U.S. from investing and doing business with Chinese companies, including Xiaomi. This effectively blocked the smartphone manufacturer from selling or supplying its goods to U.S. clients.
Xiaomi wins in its lawsuit
However, on Friday, March 12, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras of Washington temporarily blocked the Defense Department from disallowing U.S. investments in Xiaomi. The judge just canceled the ban and clearly sided with the Chinese company in its lawsuit that aims to have its name removed from the blacklisted firms.
In his decision, Judge Contreras said that the move was “arbitrary and capricious” and visibly stripped Xiaomi of its rights to due process. As per Bloomberg, the judge added that Xiaomi is also most likely to win in the lawsuit and fully reverse the ban so it can start doing business again in the U.S.
The decision was also said to have been placed to prevent the company from suffering from further irreparable harm. This is because when the prohibition was initially announced, Xiaomi was faced with the likelihood of being de-listed from the U.S. stock exchange, which in turn will lead to its removal from global benchmark indexes. When this happens, it will be a big business disaster for the company.
Finally, The Wall Street Journal reported that Judge Contreras pointed out that being a technology company doesn’t suggest a link to the Chinese military. He said that “investment in technology does not necessarily equate to military link.” He further reasoned that the U.S. was not able to convincingly show that there is such a connection between Xiaomi and the Chinese army.
“Xiaomi is a publicly-traded company that produces commercial products for civilian use, is controlled by its independent board and controlling shareholders, and is not effectively controlled or associated with others under the ownership or control of the PRC or its security services,” he said.


Tencent Reviews Marvelous Stake as Gaming Giant Reassesses Global Investment Strategy
Tesla and NatPower Partner on $5 Billion Battery Storage Expansion in Europe
Heineken Names JDE Peet’s CEO Rafael Oliveira as New Chief Executive
Anthropic AI Model Uncovers Vulnerabilities in Classified U.S. Government Systems During Security Test
DOJ Opens Investigation Into NYC Coffee Shop Over Anti-Goldman Social Media Post
Meta Pauses Employee Activity Tracking Program Over Data Security Concerns
SK Hynix Moves Closer to New York ADR Listing Amid AI Chip Boom
Alibaba Shares Fall After Anthropic Alleges Massive AI Model Distillation Campaign
Kioxia Targets U.S. Listing as AI Chip Boom Accelerates
Ryan Cohen Rejects GameStop Pay Package, Prepares New eBay Acquisition Plan
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
Samsung and SK Hynix Shares Jump After Micron Earnings Boost AI Chip Optimism
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
Trip.com Shares Tumble After Q1 Profit Drops and Weak Revenue Growth Outlook
FedEx Stock Drops After Weak 2026 Earnings Forecast Despite Strong Q4 Results
Bain Capital Nears Deal for Majority Stake in Volkswagen Marine Engine Unit Everllence
Nissan Halts Electric Qashqai Development Amid EV Market Challenges 



