Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf
GM Issues Recall for 2026 Chevrolet Silverado Trucks Over Missing Owner Manuals
Netflix Nearing Major Deal to Acquire Warner Bros Discovery Assets
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 



