The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a Hawaii law restricting licensed handgun owners from carrying firearms on private property open to the public without the owner's explicit permission violates the Second Amendment. The 6-3 decision, led by the court's conservative majority, marks another significant expansion of gun rights in the United States and could affect similar firearm laws in several other states.
Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said Hawaii's law unfairly limited the constitutional right of Americans to carry firearms for self-defense during everyday activities. The ruling overturns a lower court decision that had previously upheld the law and was supported before the Supreme Court by the Trump administration.
The legal challenge was filed by three Hawaii residents with concealed-carry permits and a Honolulu-based gun rights organization after Governor Josh Green signed the measure into law in 2023. The law required gun owners to receive express authorization before bringing a handgun onto private businesses or other privately owned locations accessible to the public.
The court's three liberal justices dissented. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argued that the majority had stretched previous Supreme Court rulings beyond their intended scope, claiming the decision places firearm access above legislative authority. Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined her dissent.
Gun control advocates also criticized the ruling. Giffords Law Center stated that Hawaii's law respected the rights of private property owners to determine whether firearms should be allowed on their premises. However, the group noted that property owners may still have legal options to prohibit guns on their property.
Hawaii officials expressed disappointment but pledged to continue pursuing firearm regulations that comply with the Constitution while prioritizing public safety.
The Supreme Court's decision builds on its landmark 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which expanded the right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense and established that firearm restrictions must align with the nation's historical tradition of gun regulation. The court did not address separate challenges involving Hawaii's restrictions on carrying firearms in locations such as beaches, bars, and other designated sensitive places.


Marco Rubio Says U.S. Will Block IRGC-Linked Individuals From Iran World Cup Delegation
Trump Administration Plans Deportation of Iranian Migrants to Central African Republic Under New Third-Country Deal
Bayer Wins Major U.S. Supreme Court Roundup Lawsuit, Shares Surge
Venezuela Deploys Troops to Crack Down on Illegal Gold Mining Amid Push for Foreign Investment
U.S. Launches Trade Investigation Into Germany’s Pharmaceutical Cost-Cutting Plans
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
US Urges States and Businesses to Strengthen Taiwan Ties Amid China Pressure
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings
Republican Lawmaker Introduces AI Incident Reporting Bill to Strengthen U.S. AI Safety
SEC Tokenized Stock Approval Still Expected as Regulatory Framework Advances
Brazil Supreme Court Convicts Eduardo Bolsonaro Over U.S. Lobbying Efforts
ASIC Launches Formal Investigation Into KPMG Australia Partners Over Client Data Misuse Allegations
RFK Jr. Orders Extended Hantavirus Quarantine for Cruise Passenger
Colombia Opens New Investigation Into Former President Álvaro Uribe Over Paramilitary Allegations
US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures 



