A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


Rubio Faces Gulf Skepticism Over U.S.-Iran Peace Deal
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Law Enforcement Mask Ban
US Waives Iran Sanctions for 60 Days as Peace Talks Advance and Lebanon Sees Calm
Pelosi Discloses Major Intel and Uber Call Option Purchases Worth Up to $6 Million
NTSB Investigates Boston Logan Airport Near-Miss Between Delta and American Airlines Jets
Trump Orders DOJ Investigation Into Exxon, Chevron Over High Gas Prices
UNAIDS Urges U.S. to Reconsider South Africa HIV Funding Withdrawal
RFK Jr. Orders Extended Hantavirus Quarantine for Cruise Passenger
White House Seeks $1.4 Billion to Combat Growing Ebola Outbreak
Marco Rubio Says U.S. Will Block IRGC-Linked Individuals From Iran World Cup Delegation
US Sanctions Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel and Key Officials Amid Rising Tensions
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members
Trump Administration Plans Deportation of Iranian Migrants to Central African Republic Under New Third-Country Deal
NATO Chief Tries to Ease Trump Alliance Dispute
HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures
Russian Air Strikes Injure Six Across Ukraine as Kyiv Issues Air Raid Alert 



