A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that California’s long-standing ban on openly carrying firearms in most parts of the state violates the Second Amendment, marking a significant development in ongoing legal battles over gun control laws. The decision was issued Friday by a divided three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a 2-1 ruling, the court sided with a California gun owner who challenged the state’s prohibition on open carry in counties with populations exceeding 200,000 residents. This threshold covers roughly 95% of California’s population, effectively making open carry illegal across most of the state. The panel concluded that the law was unconstitutional under the framework established by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Writing for the majority, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke, appointed by former President Donald Trump, stated that open carry has deep historical roots in the United States that predate the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling requires modern firearm regulations to align with the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation. According to VanDyke, the historical record clearly supports the practice of openly carrying firearms for self-defense.
The opinion noted that more than 30 U.S. states generally permit open carry and that California itself allowed the practice without penalty until 2012. Another Trump-appointed judge joined VanDyke’s opinion. However, the panel rejected a separate challenge to California’s open-carry licensing system in smaller counties, which may issue permits at local discretion.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith dissented, arguing that California’s firearm restrictions fully comply with Supreme Court precedent. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said it is reviewing its legal options and reaffirmed its commitment to defending the state’s gun laws.
The ruling partially overturns a lower court’s 2023 decision and comes amid a wave of nationwide challenges to firearm regulations following the Bruen decision. Notably, the 9th Circuit previously upheld California’s restrictions on carrying guns in designated “sensitive places” such as bars, parks, and stadiums, underscoring that the broader legal debate over gun rights in California is far from settled.


U.S. Eases Venezuela Oil Sanctions to Boost American Investment After Maduro Ouster
Paul Atkins Emphasizes Global Regulatory Cooperation at Fintech Conference
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Ukraine-Russia Talks Yield Major POW Swap as U.S. Pushes for Path to Peace
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
US Judge Rejects $2.36B Penalty Bid Against Google in Privacy Data Case
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
RFK Jr. Overhauls Federal Autism Panel, Sparking Medical Community Backlash
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
U.S. Justice Department Removes DHS Lawyer After Blunt Remarks in Minnesota Immigration Court
Trump Extends AGOA Trade Program for Africa Through 2026, Supporting Jobs and U.S.-Africa Trade
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients 



