Trump’s Proposed Port Fees Spark Backlash from U.S. Exporters and Energy Industry

President Donald Trump’s administration faces growing criticism over its plan to impose steep fees—up to $3 million per port call—on China-built ships entering U.S. ports. Energy, agriculture, and shipping executives warned during a Washington hearing that the move could backfire, inflating shipping costs and crippling U.S. exports.

The administration claims the fees will curb China’s maritime dominance and revitalize American shipbuilding. However, opponents argue it will hurt American farmers, miners, and energy producers who rely heavily on Chinese-built vessels. With U.S. shipyards producing only five ships a year compared to China’s 1,700, industry leaders say exemptions or phased implementation are critical.

Gregory Kravitz of Oxbow Corporation stated the policy would “punish American industry,” while the American Petroleum Institute’s Aaron Padilla said it jeopardizes the U.S.’s status as a net energy exporter. The National Mining Association also warned it threatens jobs and industrial revitalization.

A Trade Partnership Worldwide study estimates that oil exports could drop 18.6%, coal by 24.5%, soybeans by 42.2%, and wheat by 64.4%. United Grain Corp noted shipping costs for bulk commodities like wheat and corn have already surged 40%.

Dole Plc, which makes 300 U.S. port calls annually, said bananas—America’s most consumed fruit—could become unaffordable due to the fees. Perdue AgriBusiness warned it would impact both imported animal feed and exported poultry.

Shipping giant MSC said it may reduce U.S. port calls to cut costs, potentially triggering pandemic-like delays and shortages. Critics say the plan would disrupt global supply chains and harm exports of high-value perishables like almonds and fresh beef.

The final decision on the proposal is pending, following two days of testimony from both opponents and supporters, including the domestic steel industry.