California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery 
Laura Fernandez Set to Become Costa Rica’s Next President, Promising Sweeping Political Change 
U.S. Condemns South Africa’s Expulsion of Israeli Diplomat Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions 
Zelenskiy Awaits U.S. Response After Russian Strikes Damage Ukraine’s Energy Infrastructure 
Trump Administration Appeals Judge’s Order Limiting ICE Tactics in Minneapolis 
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants 
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines 
Costa Rica Election: Laura Fernandez Wins Presidency as PPSO Secures Congressional Majority 
Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation 
Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits 
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding 
DOJ Sues Virginia Over Failure to Provide Full Voter Registration Records 
Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors 
UN Peacekeepers to Deploy Ceasefire Monitoring Team to Eastern Congo After Doha Talks 
Trump Calls for “Nationalizing” Voting, Drawing Backlash Over Election Authority 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns 
The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, to regain unrestricted access to sensitive data from the Social Security Administration (SSA). The request follows a lower court ruling that halted the data-sharing agreement, citing potential violations of federal privacy laws.
In a filing on Friday, the Justice Department argued that the district court overstepped its authority by blocking access for DOGE personnel tasked with modernizing government systems. “The court is interfering with executive duties by determining who ‘needs’ access to critical systems,” the filing stated.
DOGE, created as part of President Trump’s initiative to slash government waste and cut jobs, has been rapidly integrating across federal agencies. Its data access at SSA was challenged by two labor unions and a public advocacy group, who claimed the access was excessive and violated longstanding privacy expectations.
U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, appointed by former President Obama, ruled on April 17 that DOGE failed to justify its “unprecedented, unfettered” access to SSA’s data. She emphasized that the SSA has maintained a nearly 90-year tradition of privacy in handling citizens’ records, adding that the case “exposes a wide fissure in the foundation.”
On April 30, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond declined to lift Hollander’s block in a divided ruling. The Supreme Court has now directed the plaintiffs to respond to the government’s appeal by May 12.
The high-stakes legal battle underscores growing concerns over data privacy, executive overreach, and the expanding role of tech moguls in public administration. The outcome could have lasting implications for federal data governance and citizen privacy.
