The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to weaken one of the nation’s most important civil rights laws — the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Enacted under President Lyndon B. Johnson and championed by Martin Luther King Jr., the law outlawed racial discrimination in voting. Now, nearly 60 years later, its Section 2, which prohibits voting practices that dilute minority voting power, faces a serious threat.
The latest challenge stems from Louisiana, where Black residents make up one-third of the population. A Republican-led legislature added a second Black-majority congressional district after a court found the previous map violated Section 2. However, white voters sued, claiming the redrawn map placed too much emphasis on race and violated constitutional equal protection rights. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled support for curbing Section 2’s reach during arguments on Wednesday.
The Justice Department, echoing Trump-era arguments, proposed a framework giving states greater flexibility to prioritize “race-neutral” districting principles. Legal experts warn this approach could make proving racial discrimination in redistricting cases nearly impossible. George Washington University law professor Spencer Overton said such a ruling would “effectively gut” Section 2, allowing state legislatures to entrench partisan power and marginalize minority voters.
The Voting Rights Act, strengthened in 1982 by adding the “results test,” once served as a powerful tool against systemic discrimination. But the Supreme Court has gradually weakened it — notably in the 2013 Shelby County v. Holderdecision that ended federal oversight of states with histories of discrimination. Now, justices may further erode protections under the guise of constitutional colorblindness.
If the Court limits Section 2 enforcement, analysts say Republicans could gain up to 19 congressional seats, reshaping the political map. Civil rights advocates, including the ACLU, vow to continue the fight for fair representation and equal access to the ballot box, warning that this decision could define the future of U.S. democracy.


DOJ Sues Loudoun County School Board Over Transgender Locker Room Policy
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Pause on New Wind-Energy Permits
Belarus Pledges to Halt Smuggling Balloons Into Lithuania
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule
Hong Kong Democratic Party Disbands After Member Vote Amid Security Crackdown
U.S. Pressures ICC to Limit Authority as Washington Threatens New Sanctions
Global Leaders Condemn Deadly Antisemitic Shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach During Hanukkah
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders
California Jury Awards $40 Million in Johnson & Johnson Talc Cancer Lawsuit
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs
Korea Zinc Plans $6.78 Billion U.S. Smelter Investment With Government Partnership
U.S. Soldiers Killed in ISIS Attack in Palmyra, Syria During Counterterrorism Mission
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations
Special Prosecutor Alleges Yoon Suk Yeol Sought North Korea Provocation to Justify Martial Law 



