The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to weaken one of the nation’s most important civil rights laws — the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Enacted under President Lyndon B. Johnson and championed by Martin Luther King Jr., the law outlawed racial discrimination in voting. Now, nearly 60 years later, its Section 2, which prohibits voting practices that dilute minority voting power, faces a serious threat.
The latest challenge stems from Louisiana, where Black residents make up one-third of the population. A Republican-led legislature added a second Black-majority congressional district after a court found the previous map violated Section 2. However, white voters sued, claiming the redrawn map placed too much emphasis on race and violated constitutional equal protection rights. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority signaled support for curbing Section 2’s reach during arguments on Wednesday.
The Justice Department, echoing Trump-era arguments, proposed a framework giving states greater flexibility to prioritize “race-neutral” districting principles. Legal experts warn this approach could make proving racial discrimination in redistricting cases nearly impossible. George Washington University law professor Spencer Overton said such a ruling would “effectively gut” Section 2, allowing state legislatures to entrench partisan power and marginalize minority voters.
The Voting Rights Act, strengthened in 1982 by adding the “results test,” once served as a powerful tool against systemic discrimination. But the Supreme Court has gradually weakened it — notably in the 2013 Shelby County v. Holderdecision that ended federal oversight of states with histories of discrimination. Now, justices may further erode protections under the guise of constitutional colorblindness.
If the Court limits Section 2 enforcement, analysts say Republicans could gain up to 19 congressional seats, reshaping the political map. Civil rights advocates, including the ACLU, vow to continue the fight for fair representation and equal access to the ballot box, warning that this decision could define the future of U.S. democracy.


Supreme Court Tests Federal Reserve Independence Amid Trump’s Bid to Fire Lisa Cook
Newly Released DOJ Epstein Files Expose High-Profile Connections Across Politics and Business
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape
Trump Endorses Japan’s Sanae Takaichi Ahead of Crucial Election Amid Market and China Tensions
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
Trump Administration Sued Over Suspension of Critical Hudson River Tunnel Funding
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit
Nighttime Shelling Causes Serious Damage in Russia’s Belgorod Region Near Ukraine Border
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Norway Opens Corruption Probe Into Former PM and Nobel Committee Chair Thorbjoern Jagland Over Epstein Links 



