Polo Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger have reportedly blocked the IP addresses of their Korean customers to stop them from visiting their home web page. The fashion brands are said to have made the move to make Koreans buy goods from local outlets instead.
So far, only Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger have removed the access of Korean customers to their home IP addresses at this time. Officials in the fashion industry confirmed the ban on Wednesday, Aug. 9.
The Korea Times reported that many shoppers tend to buy directly from the brand's country of origin because the prices are lower, but for sellers of the items in different regions, this is disadvantageous for their business. This is because they will lose local buyers and yield little to no sales.
Thus, it is understandable why this practice of buying directly from the companies that made the products has become a problem for international fashion companies that are selling items on their Korea-based websites.
In any case, local shoppers found out that they were blocked from the websites of Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger when they are always being redirected back to Korean websites that are selling the brands' fashion products. Every time people try to visit the North American online stores of the brands, they are automatically brought to Korean-language stores.
One customer shared, "I used the American website to buy Ralph Lauren items during Black Fridays before. But now I get redirected to a Korean website whenever I try to connect to U.S. one. It's a shame that a global company like Ralph Lauren blocked local IPs."
Local customers said the situation is the same when they visit Tommy Hilfiger's U.S. website. They are being redirected to the label's website in Korea, which Handsome.com operates.
Finally, Hankyung News reported that the brands barred the Korean IPs so local customers would stick to buying products in their region. "It is at the discretion of the company to have different sales strategies for each country, but blocking access to the website itself can be seen as an act of limiting consumer choice," an official in the fashion sector said.
Photo by: Hayffield L/Unsplash


Coca-Cola’s Costa Coffee Sale Faces Uncertainty as Talks With TDR Capital Hit Snag
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies
Asian Stocks Rally as Tech Rebounds, China Lags on Nvidia Competition Concerns
JD.com Pledges 22 Billion Yuan Housing Support for Couriers as China’s Instant Retail Competition Heats Up
Rio Tinto Signs Interim Agreement With Yinhawangka Aboriginal Group Over Pilbara Mining Operations
Fortescue Expands Copper Portfolio With Full Takeover of Alta Copper
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand
BOJ Expected to Deliver December Rate Hike as Economists See Borrowing Costs Rising Through 2025
SpaceX Insider Share Sale Values Company Near $800 Billion Amid IPO Speculation
Fed Rate Cut Signals Balance Between Inflation and Jobs, Says Mary Daly
HSBC’s $13.6 Billion Take-Private Offer for Hang Seng Bank Gains Board Backing
ASX Shares Slide After ASIC Imposes A$150 Million Capital Requirement
SpaceX Begins IPO Preparations as Wall Street Banks Line Up for Advisory Roles
Oil Prices Rebound in Asia as Venezuela Sanctions Risks Offset Ukraine Peace Hopes
Russia Stocks End Flat as Energy and Retail Shares Show Mixed Performance
Asian Currencies Steady as Fed Delivers Hawkish Rate Cut; Aussie and Rupee Under Pressure 



