Polo Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger have reportedly blocked the IP addresses of their Korean customers to stop them from visiting their home web page. The fashion brands are said to have made the move to make Koreans buy goods from local outlets instead.
So far, only Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger have removed the access of Korean customers to their home IP addresses at this time. Officials in the fashion industry confirmed the ban on Wednesday, Aug. 9.
The Korea Times reported that many shoppers tend to buy directly from the brand's country of origin because the prices are lower, but for sellers of the items in different regions, this is disadvantageous for their business. This is because they will lose local buyers and yield little to no sales.
Thus, it is understandable why this practice of buying directly from the companies that made the products has become a problem for international fashion companies that are selling items on their Korea-based websites.
In any case, local shoppers found out that they were blocked from the websites of Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger when they are always being redirected back to Korean websites that are selling the brands' fashion products. Every time people try to visit the North American online stores of the brands, they are automatically brought to Korean-language stores.
One customer shared, "I used the American website to buy Ralph Lauren items during Black Fridays before. But now I get redirected to a Korean website whenever I try to connect to U.S. one. It's a shame that a global company like Ralph Lauren blocked local IPs."
Local customers said the situation is the same when they visit Tommy Hilfiger's U.S. website. They are being redirected to the label's website in Korea, which Handsome.com operates.
Finally, Hankyung News reported that the brands barred the Korean IPs so local customers would stick to buying products in their region. "It is at the discretion of the company to have different sales strategies for each country, but blocking access to the website itself can be seen as an act of limiting consumer choice," an official in the fashion sector said.
Photo by: Hayffield L/Unsplash


Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns
South Korea Assures U.S. on Trade Deal Commitments Amid Tariff Concerns
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
Fed Governor Lisa Cook Warns Inflation Risks Remain as Rates Stay Steady
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 



