In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Greece’s Bad Loan Crisis Continues to Limit Credit Access Despite Economic Recovery
China Expands Export Controls, Adds 20 Japanese Companies to Restricted List
Anthropic Restores Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 After U.S. Lifts AI Export Controls
Chip Stocks Rally as Samsung and SK Hynix’s $1.3 Trillion Investment Plan Boosts AI Optimism
Canada Grants C$7 Million to Greenland Molybdenum Mine to Strengthen Critical Minerals Supply
Dollar Slips Ahead of Key U.S. Jobs Data as Fed Rate Outlook, ECB, and Iran Talks Shape Forex Markets
Oil Prices Rise as U.S.-Iran Talks Keep Geopolitical Risks in Focus
Global Financial Firms Shift Asia Expansion Focus to South Korea as China, India Face Caution
UN Chief Urges Nations to Close $100 Million UNRWA Funding Gap
SoftBank Shares Slide as OpenAI IPO Delay Concerns Weigh on AI Investment Outlook
Morgan Stanley Names BAE Systems Top European Defence Stock Despite Lower Price Target
Super Micro Shares Slide After Taiwan Raids Over Alleged Nvidia AI Chip Smuggling Probe
Nvidia Stock Rises as SemiAnalysis Sees AI Data Center Revenue Beating Wall Street Forecasts
SK Holdings, KKR Launch $1.3B Renewable Energy Venture in South Korea
Trump Questions Housing Bill as He Prioritizes SAVE America Act
Trump Urges Gasoline Retailers to Cut Prices to $2.50 Per Gallon, Warns of Legal Action
Buffett Delays Gates Foundation Donation Pending Epstein Ties Review 



