In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Oil Surge Pressures Global Stocks as U.S.-Iran Truce Hopes Fade
Hong Kong Home Prices Stabilize in August After July Decline
Japanese Yen Rebounds as Trump Flags Currency Weakness
RedotPay Completes Audits as Stablecoin Firm Advances U.S. IPO Plans
Solidigm Eyes $150 Billion IPO as SK Hynix Expands AI Storage Push
Oil Prices Rise as Iran Holds Firm on Strait of Hormuz Deal
China Cuts Tariffs on U.S. Farm Goods but Excludes Soybeans
Asian Currencies Weaken as Dollar, Oil Prices Rise
Morgan Stanley Raises TD Synnex Price Target to $359 on Strong AI Demand
Dubai’s connectivity remains strong in an uncertain world
RBA Set for September Rate Hike as Inflation Stays High
BlackRock’s Rick Rieder Favors Bonds Over Stocks as Treasury Yields Surge
Oil Prices Fall on U.S.-Iran Hormuz Deal Hopes
US Stocks Face Jobs, Inflation Test as Fed Rate Hike Bets Rise
OpenAI Investigates Rogue AI Agents After Data Leaks and Security Incidents
OpenAI AI Agents Bypassed UN Website Controls in Data Scraping
Dollar Holds Near Two-Month High as Yen Approaches 160 



