Naver Corp. was formally charged by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors Office on Thursday, Sept. 8. The South Korean online platform and tech firm was indicted for breach of the country's fair trade law.
The company was said to have abused its dominance in the market related to dealing with a real estate information partner. According to Yonhap News Agency, the prosecutor's office charged Naver over the accusations that it stopped a certain market information provider, which was not specified, from selling data to Kakao Corporation, the company's major rival in the industry. The alleged blocking happened between May 2015 and September 2017.
The case against Naver was first launched after the country's anti-trust watchdog, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), filed a criminal complaint in November of last year. The filing was requested by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups groups.
It was noted that the FTC already fined Naver in December 2020 after a probe revealed it had signed a deal with a market data company with the condition that the unnamed data firm would not provide market data information to Kakao. For this offense, the internet portal giant was penalized with a $767,000 fine which is about KRW1 billion.
The Small and Medium Enterprises ministry group asked the trade commission to go after Naver by continuing its criminal investigation. The request from SME came after reviews determined that Naver caused damage to the company as its potential contract with Kakao has been blocked.
In response to the charge, Naver said it would challenge the prosecution's decision against them. The company vowed to pursue a legal fight over the case. At any rate, prior to the indictment this week, the prosecutors raided the firm's headquarters in Seongnam, Seoul, and this was related to the abuse of market dominance allegations.
At that time, investigators and prosecutors were sent by the Fair Trade Investigation Department of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office to Naver's main office in Bundang, Gyeonggi, to investigate and see if there is proof that the company indeed violated the Fair Trade Act.


Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
South Korea’s Weak Won Struggles as Retail Investors Pour Money Into U.S. Stocks
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
Fed Governor Lisa Cook Warns Inflation Risks Remain as Rates Stay Steady
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal 



