Naver Corp. was formally charged by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors Office on Thursday, Sept. 8. The South Korean online platform and tech firm was indicted for breach of the country's fair trade law.
The company was said to have abused its dominance in the market related to dealing with a real estate information partner. According to Yonhap News Agency, the prosecutor's office charged Naver over the accusations that it stopped a certain market information provider, which was not specified, from selling data to Kakao Corporation, the company's major rival in the industry. The alleged blocking happened between May 2015 and September 2017.
The case against Naver was first launched after the country's anti-trust watchdog, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), filed a criminal complaint in November of last year. The filing was requested by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups groups.
It was noted that the FTC already fined Naver in December 2020 after a probe revealed it had signed a deal with a market data company with the condition that the unnamed data firm would not provide market data information to Kakao. For this offense, the internet portal giant was penalized with a $767,000 fine which is about KRW1 billion.
The Small and Medium Enterprises ministry group asked the trade commission to go after Naver by continuing its criminal investigation. The request from SME came after reviews determined that Naver caused damage to the company as its potential contract with Kakao has been blocked.
In response to the charge, Naver said it would challenge the prosecution's decision against them. The company vowed to pursue a legal fight over the case. At any rate, prior to the indictment this week, the prosecutors raided the firm's headquarters in Seongnam, Seoul, and this was related to the abuse of market dominance allegations.
At that time, investigators and prosecutors were sent by the Fair Trade Investigation Department of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office to Naver's main office in Bundang, Gyeonggi, to investigate and see if there is proof that the company indeed violated the Fair Trade Act.


Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
U.S. Stock Futures Slide as Tech Rout Deepens on Amazon Capex Shock
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record
Thailand Inflation Remains Negative for 10th Straight Month in January
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals
Japanese Pharmaceutical Stocks Slide as TrumpRx.gov Launch Sparks Market Concerns
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 



