Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips 
China Adds Domestic AI Chips to Government Procurement List as U.S. Considers Easing Nvidia Export Curbs 
EssilorLuxottica Bets on AI-Powered Smart Glasses as Competition Intensifies 
Rio Tinto Signs Interim Agreement With Yinhawangka Aboriginal Group Over Pilbara Mining Operations 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
Westpac Director Peter Nash Avoids Major Investor Backlash Amid ASX Scrutiny 
SK Hynix Considers U.S. ADR Listing to Boost Shareholder Value Amid Rising AI Chip Demand 
Trump Signs Executive Order to Establish National AI Regulation Standard 
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns 
Air Transat Reaches Tentative Agreement With Pilots, Avoids Strike and Restores Normal Operations 
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk Denies Reports of $800 Billion Valuation Fundraise 
SK Hynix Labeled “Investment Warning Stock” After Extraordinary 200% Share Surge 
As many already know, Microsoft is in the process of acquiring Activision Blizzard. The deal is currently under review by regulators in various parts of the world, but the Xbox’s parent company has also found itself in an ongoing spat with Sony regarding the future of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation.
PlayStation president Jim Ryan has responded to Microsoft’s recent statement, maintaining that “Call of Duty” will remain available on Sony’s gaming console. And Ryan said the commitment that Xbox’s parent company made “was inadequate on many levels.”
Microsoft said in January that future “Call of Duty” games will still be released on PlayStation even after Sony’s existing deals with Activision. Then, last week, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer revealed it even provided a “signed agreement” to Sony to reflect this commitment.
Spencer’s statement came shortly after the United Kingdom’s Competition, and Markets Authority said Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard “could substantially lessen competition.” But after the signed agreement concerning “Call of Duty” was revealed, Ryan called out Spencer for supposedly making a “private business discussion” public knowledge.
“Microsoft has only offered for ‘Call of Duty’ to remain on PlayStation for three years after the current agreement between Activision and Sony ends,” Ryan told GamesIndustry.biz. “Their proposal was inadequate on many levels and failed to take account of the impact on our gamers.”
Activision Blizzard has a number of very popular video game franchises that would become Microsoft-owned IPs once the acquisition is completed. But the focus has been cast on “Call of Duty” in recent responses Microsoft and Sony provided to regulators scrutinizing the $68.7 billion transaction.
It remains to be seen how Ryan’s response will affect regulators’ investigation of Microsoft and Activision Blizzard’s deal. But the potential of future “Call of Duty” games being exclusive to Xbox consoles and services is unsurprisingly one of the biggest considerations in reviewing the acquisition.
The focus on “Call of Duty’s” future availability on consoles amid the ongoing acquisition was expected because it is one of the biggest-selling IPs in the video game industry, not just in the first-person shooter segment. Activision revealed to the Washington Post last June that the franchise’s lifetime revenue has surpassed $30 billion after selling more than 425 million copies.
Photo by Marco Verch from Flickr under Creative Commons license
