Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Netflix’s Bid for Warner Bros Discovery Aims to Cut Streaming Costs and Reshape the Industry 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Amazon and Google Launch New Multicloud Networking Service to Boost High-Speed Cloud Connectivity 
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift 
Nexperia Urges China Division to Resume Chip Production as Supply Risks Mount 
Baidu Cuts Jobs as AI Competition and Ad Revenue Slump Intensify 
Apple Leads Singles’ Day Smartphone Sales as iPhone 17 Demand Surges 
Taiwan Opposition Criticizes Plan to Block Chinese App Rednote Over Security Concerns 
Norway’s Wealth Fund Backs Shareholder Push for Microsoft Human-Rights Risk Report 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Microchip Technology Boosts Q3 Outlook on Strong Bookings Momentum 
ExxonMobil to Shut Older Singapore Steam Cracker Amid Global Petrochemical Downturn 
Australia Releases New National AI Plan, Opts for Existing Laws to Manage Risks 
Quantum Systems Projects Revenue Surge as It Eyes IPO or Private Sale 
Magnum Audit Flags Governance Issues at Ben & Jerry’s Foundation Ahead of Spin-Off 
As many already know, Microsoft is in the process of acquiring Activision Blizzard. The deal is currently under review by regulators in various parts of the world, but the Xbox’s parent company has also found itself in an ongoing spat with Sony regarding the future of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation.
PlayStation president Jim Ryan has responded to Microsoft’s recent statement, maintaining that “Call of Duty” will remain available on Sony’s gaming console. And Ryan said the commitment that Xbox’s parent company made “was inadequate on many levels.”
Microsoft said in January that future “Call of Duty” games will still be released on PlayStation even after Sony’s existing deals with Activision. Then, last week, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer revealed it even provided a “signed agreement” to Sony to reflect this commitment.
Spencer’s statement came shortly after the United Kingdom’s Competition, and Markets Authority said Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard “could substantially lessen competition.” But after the signed agreement concerning “Call of Duty” was revealed, Ryan called out Spencer for supposedly making a “private business discussion” public knowledge.
“Microsoft has only offered for ‘Call of Duty’ to remain on PlayStation for three years after the current agreement between Activision and Sony ends,” Ryan told GamesIndustry.biz. “Their proposal was inadequate on many levels and failed to take account of the impact on our gamers.”
Activision Blizzard has a number of very popular video game franchises that would become Microsoft-owned IPs once the acquisition is completed. But the focus has been cast on “Call of Duty” in recent responses Microsoft and Sony provided to regulators scrutinizing the $68.7 billion transaction.
It remains to be seen how Ryan’s response will affect regulators’ investigation of Microsoft and Activision Blizzard’s deal. But the potential of future “Call of Duty” games being exclusive to Xbox consoles and services is unsurprisingly one of the biggest considerations in reviewing the acquisition.
The focus on “Call of Duty’s” future availability on consoles amid the ongoing acquisition was expected because it is one of the biggest-selling IPs in the video game industry, not just in the first-person shooter segment. Activision revealed to the Washington Post last June that the franchise’s lifetime revenue has surpassed $30 billion after selling more than 425 million copies.
Photo by Marco Verch from Flickr under Creative Commons license
