SpaceX Reportedly Preparing Record-Breaking IPO Targeting $1.5 Trillion Valuation 
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters 
U.S. Greenlights Nvidia H200 Chip Exports to China With 25% Fee 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand 
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 
Microsoft Unveils Massive Global AI Investments, Prioritizing India’s Rapidly Growing Digital Market 
Air Force One Delivery Delayed to 2028 as Boeing Faces Rising Costs 
Westpac Director Peter Nash Avoids Major Investor Backlash Amid ASX Scrutiny 
Moore Threads Stock Slides After Risk Warning Despite 600% Surge Since IPO 
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips 
Australia Enforces World-First Social Media Age Limit as Global Regulation Looms 
United Airlines Tokyo-Bound Flight Returns to Dulles After Engine Failure 
Evercore Reaffirms Alphabet’s Search Dominance as AI Competition Intensifies 
As many already know, Microsoft is in the process of acquiring Activision Blizzard. The deal is currently under review by regulators in various parts of the world, but the Xbox’s parent company has also found itself in an ongoing spat with Sony regarding the future of “Call of Duty” on PlayStation.
PlayStation president Jim Ryan has responded to Microsoft’s recent statement, maintaining that “Call of Duty” will remain available on Sony’s gaming console. And Ryan said the commitment that Xbox’s parent company made “was inadequate on many levels.”
Microsoft said in January that future “Call of Duty” games will still be released on PlayStation even after Sony’s existing deals with Activision. Then, last week, Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer revealed it even provided a “signed agreement” to Sony to reflect this commitment.
Spencer’s statement came shortly after the United Kingdom’s Competition, and Markets Authority said Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard “could substantially lessen competition.” But after the signed agreement concerning “Call of Duty” was revealed, Ryan called out Spencer for supposedly making a “private business discussion” public knowledge.
“Microsoft has only offered for ‘Call of Duty’ to remain on PlayStation for three years after the current agreement between Activision and Sony ends,” Ryan told GamesIndustry.biz. “Their proposal was inadequate on many levels and failed to take account of the impact on our gamers.”
Activision Blizzard has a number of very popular video game franchises that would become Microsoft-owned IPs once the acquisition is completed. But the focus has been cast on “Call of Duty” in recent responses Microsoft and Sony provided to regulators scrutinizing the $68.7 billion transaction.
It remains to be seen how Ryan’s response will affect regulators’ investigation of Microsoft and Activision Blizzard’s deal. But the potential of future “Call of Duty” games being exclusive to Xbox consoles and services is unsurprisingly one of the biggest considerations in reviewing the acquisition.
The focus on “Call of Duty’s” future availability on consoles amid the ongoing acquisition was expected because it is one of the biggest-selling IPs in the video game industry, not just in the first-person shooter segment. Activision revealed to the Washington Post last June that the franchise’s lifetime revenue has surpassed $30 billion after selling more than 425 million copies.
Photo by Marco Verch from Flickr under Creative Commons license
