Lululemon and Peloton’s conflict over design patent infringement continues to escalate. On Monday, the apparel company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, filed a lawsuit against the New York-based exercise equipment firm that was also its former co-branding partner.
As per CNBC, Lululemon filed the lawsuit at the Central District of California, and the company is seeking an injunction against Peloton’s alleged violation of its intellectual property rights. The firm is also asking for compensation for damages and other monetary relief.
The legal action comes not long after Peloton also filed a suit to ask the court to formally announce it has not infringed any trade dress or design patents as Lululemon has been claiming. Peloton wants the court of law to eventually make it clear that the apparel firm’s infringement allegations are invalid.
The conflict started when Peloton launched its own apparel line after its co-branding contract with Lululemon had ended. Since the accusations have emerged, Peloton maintained people could easily tell apart which is Lululemon’s and which is Peloton’s; thus, there is no patent violation.
Still, Lululemon is insisting, Peloton violated six of their patented designs that were allegedly used to create the latter’s leggings, workout tanks, and sports bras. For the lawsuit, Peloton’s spokesman refused to comment since the litigation was ongoing.
“Peloton did not spend the time, effort, and expense to create an original product line,” CNBC quoted Lululemon as saying in the lawsuit. “Instead, Peloton imitated several of Lululemon’s innovative designs and sold knock-offs of Lululemon’s products, claiming them as its own.”
Meanwhile, Reuters reported that Lululemon’s move was a follow-up to its earlier threat to take legal action against Peloton. On its claims, the apparel brand said the five infringed patents include designs on five of Peloton sports bra and one legging design, and these are the Strappy Bra, Cadent Peak Bra, High Neck Bra, Cadent Laser Dot Bra, and the Cadent Laser Dot Leggings.
Lululemon continues to claim Peloton intended to copy its designs and pass off its goods as Lululemon's high-quality products. The legal cases between the companies are Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc v Peloton Interactive Inc, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 21-09252, and Peloton Interactive Inc v Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 21-10071.


Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported
Alphabet Stock Slides as Google AI Pioneer Jeff Dean Exits to Launch Discovery Loop
Novo Nordisk Raises 2025 Outlook Despite Wegovy Pill Miss and CagriSema Setback
Dollar Holds Near Six-Week Low as Yen Loses Momentum Ahead of U.S. Jobs Data
BOJ Rate Hike Expectations Rise Ahead of September Meeting
Meta AI Model Exploits Security Flaw During Cybersecurity Test, Raising AI Safety Concerns
Airbnb Stock Jumps After Q2 Earnings Beat, Strong 2026 Outlook
Wall Street Ends Mixed as Dow Hits Record Despite Tech Weakness
US Yen Intervention Unlikely to Deliver Lasting Recovery, Yardeni Says
China Exports Beat July Forecasts as AI Demand Fuels High-Tech Trade
US Stock Futures Hold Steady as Iran Hormuz Deal and Earnings Shape Market Sentiment
SanDisk Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as Q1 Revenue Outlook Meets Expectations
Daimler Truck Q2 Profit Falls 18%, 2026 Outlook Raised
DoorDash Q2 Revenue Jumps 36% as Orders and DashPass Growth Drive Results
Oil Prices Surge as Iran Hormuz Restrictions Renew Supply Fears
OpenAI Restricts Astra AI Over Cyberattack Risks
Singapore Says One-Third of U.S. Exports Hit by New 12.5% Tariff 



