Senior officials at the U.S. Justice Department are pressing prosecutors to bring swift charges against John Bolton, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, even as career prosecutors insist more investigation is needed, according to sources familiar with the matter. The push highlights tensions inside the department as political pressure mounts over high-profile cases involving Trump critics.
The urgency follows the recent ousting of the top federal prosecutor in Virginia, which observers say stemmed from frustration over the slow pace of prosecutions targeting figures such as Bolton and former FBI Director James Comey. Prosecutors from the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, leading the Bolton inquiry, along with attorneys from the Justice Department’s National Security Division, are resisting directives from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s office to present evidence to a grand jury as early as next week.
The investigation intensified in August when the FBI executed search warrants at Bolton’s Maryland home and Washington office, seeking evidence of possible violations of the Espionage Act. According to partially unsealed court documents, agents recovered materials marked “confidential,” including references to weapons of mass destruction, the U.S. mission to the United Nations, and other sensitive communications.
Bolton’s legal team rejects any wrongdoing, emphasizing that the documents date back to his tenure in government between 1998 and 2006, including his service during the George W. Bush administration. Attorney Abbe Lowell argued the records were ordinary papers typically retained by a long-serving official.
The Justice Department previously sued Bolton and opened a criminal probe in 2020, claiming his memoir, The Room Where It Happened, contained classified information. Although the Trump administration attempted to block the book’s release, a judge denied the request, and the Biden administration dropped both the lawsuit and investigation in 2021. Bolton has consistently maintained that efforts to silence him were politically motivated.


Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
Federal Judge Restores Funding for Gateway Rail Tunnel Project
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Unlawfully Halted EV Charger Funding 



