Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


Meta Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Approval of AI Chatbots Allowing Sexual Interactions With Minors
Trump Lawsuit Against JPMorgan Signals Rising Tensions Between Wall Street and the White House
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies
Court Allows Expert Testimony Linking Johnson & Johnson Talc Products to Ovarian Cancer
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters
CK Hutchison Unit Launches Arbitration Against Panama Over Port Concessions Ruling
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality
TrumpRx.gov Highlights GLP-1 Drug Discounts but Offers Limited Savings for Most Americans
Google Halts UK YouTube TV Measurement Service After Legal Action
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Pentagon Ends Military Education Programs With Harvard University
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal 



