Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


Brazil Supreme Court Orders Asset Freeze of Nelson Tanure Amid Banco Master Investigation
California Sues Trump Administration Over Federal Authority on Sable Offshore Pipelines
Panama Supreme Court Voids CK Hutchison Port Concessions, Raising Geopolitical and Trade Concerns
Bill and Hillary Clinton Agree to Testify in Epstein Investigation
Federal Judge Signals Possible Dismissal of xAI Lawsuit Against OpenAI
Japan Finance Minister Defends PM Takaichi’s Remarks on Weak Yen Benefits
California Attorney General Orders xAI to Halt Illegal Grok Deepfake Imagery
Minnesota Judge Rejects Bid to Halt Trump Immigration Enforcement in Minneapolis
Trump Family Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Over IRS Tax Disclosure
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Move to End TPS for Haitian Immigrants
Trump Calls for “Nationalizing” Voting, Drawing Backlash Over Election Authority
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling
Democrats Score Surprise Texas State Senate Win, Fueling Momentum Ahead of 2026 Midterms
Russia Warns Foreign Troop Deployment in Ukraine Would Be Treated as Legitimate Military Targets
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft
Taiwan Urges Stronger Trade Ties With Fellow Democracies, Rejects Economic Dependence on China 



