Google is once again facing legal challenges as a federal appeals court revives a class action lawsuit accusing the tech giant of collecting Chrome users' data without consent. The case, ongoing since 2020, challenges Google's practices despite users agreeing to the company's privacy policy.
Amid Pixel 9’s Launch, Google Faces Renewed Legal Challenges Over Chrome’s Alleged Data Misuse
According to Wccftech, Google made a significant announcement this month by introducing its Pixel 9 lineup at the Made by Google event in 2024. The lineup has been gaining attention for its advanced capabilities and enhanced features. However, the company faces a class action lawsuit regarding Chrome's data collection practices, which involve accessing user information without consent, despite being commended for its ongoing initiatives and product enhancements. The tech behemoth is now in a precarious position, as the court has reversed the earlier dismissal of the case.
The class action lawsuit has been ongoing since 2020 and is not recent. The plaintiffs contended that Google unlawfully utilized the data of Chrome users, regardless of whether they had enabled Chrome sync. The feature allows users to save bookmarks, passwords, and data to their Google account, thereby facilitating seamless information access when they sign into Chrome.
The federal appeals court reversed the previous ruling, and the class action against Google was re-commenced despite being dismissed in December 2022 (via Verge). According to the appeal court, the case should have been reviewed with greater due diligence, and the user perspective should have been considered.
Google asserted that users had authorized the company's privacy policy to access their information. The court dismissed the case by implying that Google did acquire consent. The case needed to be deemed solid enough to be pursued, as the users consented to the data collection by agreeing to the terms of service.
Judge Revives Lawsuit Against Google, Citing Concerns Over User Consent in Chrome Data Collection
Nevertheless, on August 20, Judge Milan D. Smith Jr. overturned the ruling, stating that the user's comprehension of the consent being obtained should have been considered during the decision-making process. He also ordered the case be remanded to the lower court for further consideration. Smith composed the following:
The lawsuit that has been resurrected now pertains to Chrome users who have been utilizing the browser since 2016 and have not elected to integrate their browsers with Google accounts. The plaintiffs continue to assert that Google failed to comply with its privacy notice for Chrome, which guarantees that users' data will not be accessed unless the sync feature is enabled. Google has not yet stated the ongoing matter; however, the threat of litigation necessitates that technology companies exercise greater caution regarding user consent and data collection.


FBI Warns of China’s Expanding Hack-for-Hire Network Amid Extradition Case
Nike Tariff Refund Lawsuit Sparks Consumer Backlash Over Price Increases
AMD Q1 Earnings Surge on AI Demand, Stock Jumps After Strong Guidance
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case
Texas AG Investigates Lululemon Over "Forever Chemicals" in Activewear
Meta Plans $13B AI Data Center Financing in Texas Amid Surging Big Tech Investment
AI-Driven Inflation Raises U.S. Consumer Prices, Goldman Sachs Says
Judge Delays SEC Settlement With Elon Musk Over Twitter Stock Disclosure Case
TikTok Nears $400 Million Settlement With Trump Administration Over Child Privacy Lawsuit
U.S. Army Soldier Charged in $400K Insider Betting Scheme on Maduro Capture
Armani Group Eyes Strategic Stake Sale to Luxury Giants
Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit
Orsted Q1 EBITDA Beats Expectations Despite U.S. Impairments
UOB Q1 Profit Meets Expectations as Loan Growth Offsets Lower Interest Rates
Coinbase Q1 2026 Earnings Miss Sends COIN Stock Lower Amid Crypto Market Slump
OCBC Q1 Profit Rises 5% on Strong Wealth Management and Non-Interest Income 



